Re: [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915/bios: limit default outputs to ports A through F

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 09:49:57PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 09:23:00AM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 07:03:34PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
With the defaults limited to non-TypeC ports in commit 828ccb31cf41
("drm/i915/icl: Add TypeC ports only if VBT is present"), this should be
a no-op, but clarifies the code and prepares for subsequent changes.

Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
index e9cb15aa2f5a..b9d99324d66d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
@@ -2057,11 +2057,12 @@ static void
init_vbt_missing_defaults(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
	enum port port;
+	int ports = PORT_A | PORT_B | PORT_C | PORT_D | PORT_E | PORT_F;


I'd not spread the knowledge of what port uses tc phy like this.
It's painful to maintain.

Umm, this wasn't meant to have anything to do with tc, really. Granted,
the commit message is misleading.

ok, makes more sense now. I don't want us to keep updating this function
when the ports change on new platforms.



also, not sure how this clarifies things if PORT_TC1 aliases PORT_D,
so I'd just drop this patch

The point is that I'd like to reduce the number of ports set up by
default, perhaps even further than this. It's a bit silly to generate 9
dummy child devices on certain platforms when there's no VBT.

ok. So what would be the devices without vbt? I remember relying on this
for e.g. dg1 before we could read it.

What other platforms should we care about? And for those, should we
really care about ports E and F or could we reduce it to, say the first
4?

thanks
Lucas De Marchi



BR,
Jani.


Lucas De Marchi

Lucas De Marchi


	if (!HAS_DDI(i915) && !IS_CHERRYVIEW(i915))
		return;

-	for_each_port(port) {
+	for_each_port_masked(port, ports) {
		struct ddi_vbt_port_info *info =
			&i915->vbt.ddi_port_info[port];
		enum phy phy = intel_port_to_phy(i915, port);
--
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux