On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 03:35:19PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 17 Feb 2021, "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, 16 Feb 2021, Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Intel discrete graphic devices have internal spi storage, that holds > >> > firmware and oprom images. The spi device is exposed to the user space > >> > via mtd framework to be accessed during manufacturing. > >> > The device is hardware locked after manufacturing and only read access > >> > is provided. > >> > > >> > The i915 plays role of a multi function device (mfd) and spi device is > >> > exposed as its child device. i915_spi platform driver binds to this > >> > device. > >> > >> What's the plan wrt i915/spi maintainership? > > > > My suggestions is that this will be maintained by myself, as the major > > consumer is the manufacturing line. It will be a separate section in > > MAINTAINERS file. > > Works for me. Do you want to apply the patches directly to drm-intel, or > your own branch and send pull requests to i915 maintainers? Can also > start with the former, and move to the latter as needed. > > Joonas, Rodrigo, thoughts? No strong opinion here. But I believe the pull request flow makes sense. > > BR, > Jani. > > -- > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
