Re: [PATCH v3] kcmp: Support selection of SYS_kcmp without CHECKPOINT_RESTORE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday, February 12th, 2021 at 1:57 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 at 22:01, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Userspace has discovered the functionality offered by SYS_kcmp and has
> > started to depend upon it. In particular, Mesa uses SYS_kcmp for
> > os_same_file_description() in order to identify when two fd (e.g. device
> > or dmabuf)
>
> As you rightfully point out, SYS_kcmp is a bit of a two edged sword.
> While you mention the CONFIG issue, there is also a portability aspect
> (mesa runs on more than just linux) and as well as sandbox filtering
> of the extra syscall.
>
> Last time I looked, the latter was still an issue and mesa was using
> SYS_kcmp to compare device node fds.
> A far shorter and more portable solution is possible, so let me
> prepare a Mesa patch.

Comparing two DMA-BUFs can be done with their inode number, I think.

Comparing two device FDs is more subtle, because of GEM handle
ref'counting. You sometimes really want to check whether two FDs are
backed by the same file *description*. See [1] for details.

[1]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/drm/-/merge_requests/110
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux