Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Check for scratch page scribbling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2021-02-10 10:49:55)
>> Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c
>> > index d34770ae4c9a..5ac9eb4a3a92 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c
>> > @@ -158,10 +158,49 @@ static void poison_scratch_page(struct drm_i915_gem_object *scratch)
>> >  
>> >               vaddr = kmap(page);
>> >               memset(vaddr, val, PAGE_SIZE);
>> > +             set_page_dirty(page); /* keep the poisoned contents */
>> 
>> Should we use locked version in here?
>
> We don't hold the page-lock here, so no. If this is not an anonymous
> page, something is very wrong :p

Cleared confusion in irc. We dont hold the lock and set_page_dirty dont
take it.

But this is anonymous page and we are sole user during poisoning.

Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> -Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux