Userspace has discovered the functionality offered by SYS_kcmp and has started to depend upon it. In particular, Mesa uses SYS_kcmp for os_same_file_description() in order to identify when two fd (e.g. device or dmabuf) point to the same struct file. Since they depend on it for core functionality, lift SYS_kcmp out of the non-default CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE into the selectable syscall category. Note that some distributions such as Ubuntu are already enabling CHECKPOINT_RESTORE in their configs and so, by extension, SYS_kcmp. References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3046 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Will Drewry <wad@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> # DRM depends on SYS_kcmp --- v2: - Default n. - Borrrow help message from man kcmp. - Export get_epoll_tfile_raw_ptr() for CONFIG_KCMP --- fs/eventpoll.c | 4 ++-- include/linux/eventpoll.h | 2 +- init/Kconfig | 12 ++++++++++++ kernel/Makefile | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 2 +- 5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c index a829af074eb5..3196474cbe24 100644 --- a/fs/eventpoll.c +++ b/fs/eventpoll.c @@ -979,7 +979,7 @@ static struct epitem *ep_find(struct eventpoll *ep, struct file *file, int fd) return epir; } -#ifdef CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE +#ifdef CONFIG_KCMP static struct epitem *ep_find_tfd(struct eventpoll *ep, int tfd, unsigned long toff) { struct rb_node *rbp; @@ -1021,7 +1021,7 @@ struct file *get_epoll_tfile_raw_ptr(struct file *file, int tfd, return file_raw; } -#endif /* CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE */ +#endif /* CONFIG_KCMP */ /** * Adds a new entry to the tail of the list in a lockless way, i.e. diff --git a/include/linux/eventpoll.h b/include/linux/eventpoll.h index 0350393465d4..593322c946e6 100644 --- a/include/linux/eventpoll.h +++ b/include/linux/eventpoll.h @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ struct file; #ifdef CONFIG_EPOLL -#ifdef CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE +#ifdef CONFIG_KCMP struct file *get_epoll_tfile_raw_ptr(struct file *file, int tfd, unsigned long toff); #endif diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig index b77c60f8b963..1b75141bc18b 100644 --- a/init/Kconfig +++ b/init/Kconfig @@ -1194,6 +1194,7 @@ endif # NAMESPACES config CHECKPOINT_RESTORE bool "Checkpoint/restore support" select PROC_CHILDREN + select KCMP default n help Enables additional kernel features in a sake of checkpoint/restore. @@ -1737,6 +1738,17 @@ config ARCH_HAS_MEMBARRIER_CALLBACKS config ARCH_HAS_MEMBARRIER_SYNC_CORE bool +config KCMP + bool "Enable kcmp() system call" if EXPERT + default n + help + Enable the kernel resource comparison system call. It provides + user-space with the ability to compare two processes to see if they + share a common resource, such as a file descriptor or even virtual + memory space. + + If unsure, say N. + config RSEQ bool "Enable rseq() system call" if EXPERT default y diff --git a/kernel/Makefile b/kernel/Makefile index aa7368c7eabf..320f1f3941b7 100644 --- a/kernel/Makefile +++ b/kernel/Makefile @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ obj-y += livepatch/ obj-y += dma/ obj-y += entry/ -obj-$(CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE) += kcmp.o +obj-$(CONFIG_KCMP) += kcmp.o obj-$(CONFIG_FREEZER) += freezer.o obj-$(CONFIG_PROFILING) += profile.o obj-$(CONFIG_STACKTRACE) += stacktrace.o diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c index 26c72f2b61b1..1b6c7d33c4ff 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ TEST(kcmp) ret = __filecmp(getpid(), getpid(), 1, 1); EXPECT_EQ(ret, 0); if (ret != 0 && errno == ENOSYS) - SKIP(return, "Kernel does not support kcmp() (missing CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE?)"); + SKIP(return, "Kernel does not support kcmp() (missing CONFIG_KCMP?)"); } TEST(mode_strict_support) -- 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
