Re: [PATCH 29/57] drm/i915: Move scheduler flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 01/02/2021 08:56, Chris Wilson wrote:
Start extracting the scheduling flags from the engine. We begin with its
own existence.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine.h        |  6 ++++++
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h  | 21 +++++++------------
  .../drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c  |  6 +++++-
  .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c |  2 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h           |  2 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c         |  2 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h   | 10 +++++++++
  7 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine.h
index c530839627bb..4f0163457aed 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine.h
@@ -261,6 +261,12 @@ intel_engine_has_heartbeat(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
  	return READ_ONCE(engine->props.heartbeat_interval_ms);
  }
+static inline bool
+intel_engine_has_scheduler(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+{
+	return i915_sched_is_active(intel_engine_get_scheduler(engine));
+}
+
  static inline void
  intel_engine_kick_scheduler(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
  {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h
index 6b0bde292916..a3024a0de1de 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h
@@ -440,14 +440,13 @@ struct intel_engine_cs {
#define I915_ENGINE_USING_CMD_PARSER BIT(0)
  #define I915_ENGINE_SUPPORTS_STATS   BIT(1)
-#define I915_ENGINE_HAS_SCHEDULER    BIT(2)
-#define I915_ENGINE_HAS_PREEMPTION   BIT(3)
-#define I915_ENGINE_HAS_SEMAPHORES   BIT(4)
-#define I915_ENGINE_HAS_TIMESLICES   BIT(5)
-#define I915_ENGINE_NEEDS_BREADCRUMB_TASKLET BIT(6)
-#define I915_ENGINE_IS_VIRTUAL       BIT(7)
-#define I915_ENGINE_HAS_RELATIVE_MMIO BIT(8)
-#define I915_ENGINE_REQUIRES_CMD_PARSER BIT(9)
+#define I915_ENGINE_HAS_PREEMPTION   BIT(2)
+#define I915_ENGINE_HAS_SEMAPHORES   BIT(3)
+#define I915_ENGINE_HAS_TIMESLICES   BIT(4)
+#define I915_ENGINE_NEEDS_BREADCRUMB_TASKLET BIT(5)
+#define I915_ENGINE_IS_VIRTUAL       BIT(6)
+#define I915_ENGINE_HAS_RELATIVE_MMIO BIT(7)
+#define I915_ENGINE_REQUIRES_CMD_PARSER BIT(8)
  	unsigned int flags;
/*
@@ -530,12 +529,6 @@ intel_engine_supports_stats(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
  	return engine->flags & I915_ENGINE_SUPPORTS_STATS;
  }
-static inline bool
-intel_engine_has_scheduler(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
-{
-	return engine->flags & I915_ENGINE_HAS_SCHEDULER;
-}
-
  static inline bool
  intel_engine_has_preemption(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
  {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
index b1007e560527..3217cb4369ad 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
@@ -2913,7 +2913,6 @@ logical_ring_default_vfuncs(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
  		 */
  	}
- engine->flags |= I915_ENGINE_HAS_SCHEDULER;
  	engine->flags |= I915_ENGINE_SUPPORTS_STATS;
  	if (!intel_vgpu_active(engine->i915)) {
  		engine->flags |= I915_ENGINE_HAS_SEMAPHORES;
@@ -2981,6 +2980,7 @@ int intel_execlists_submission_setup(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
  	engine->sched.is_executing = execlists_is_executing;
  	engine->sched.show = execlists_show;
  	tasklet_setup(&engine->sched.tasklet, execlists_submission_tasklet);
+	__set_bit(I915_SCHED_ACTIVE_BIT, &engine->sched.flags);

This feels a bit dodgy - does is stay like this, with the engine setting up both the tasklet and setting the bit directly? Could we say that setting a tasklet via a helper could turn on the bit?

  	timer_setup(&engine->execlists.timer, execlists_timeslice, 0);
  	timer_setup(&engine->execlists.preempt, execlists_preempt, 0);
@@ -3386,6 +3386,7 @@ intel_execlists_create_virtual(struct intel_engine_cs **siblings,
  			       unsigned int count)
  {
  	struct virtual_engine *ve;
+	unsigned long sched;
  	unsigned int n;
  	int err;
@@ -3444,6 +3445,7 @@ intel_execlists_create_virtual(struct intel_engine_cs **siblings,
  		goto err_put;
  	}
+ sched = ~0U;
  	for (n = 0; n < count; n++) {
  		struct intel_engine_cs *sibling = siblings[n];
@@ -3473,6 +3475,7 @@ intel_execlists_create_virtual(struct intel_engine_cs **siblings, ve->siblings[ve->num_siblings++] = sibling;
  		ve->base.mask |= sibling->mask;
+		sched &= sibling->sched.flags;
/*
  		 * All physical engines must be compatible for their emission
@@ -3514,6 +3517,7 @@ intel_execlists_create_virtual(struct intel_engine_cs **siblings,
  			ve->base.name,
  			ve->base.mask,
  			ENGINE_VIRTUAL);
+	ve->base.sched.flags = sched;
ve->base.sched.submit_request = virtual_submit_request;
  	tasklet_setup(&ve->base.sched.tasklet, virtual_submission_tasklet);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
index db6ac5a12834..887f38fb671f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
@@ -606,7 +606,6 @@ static void guc_default_vfuncs(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
  	}
  	engine->set_default_submission = guc_set_default_submission;
- engine->flags |= I915_ENGINE_HAS_SCHEDULER;
  	engine->flags |= I915_ENGINE_NEEDS_BREADCRUMB_TASKLET;
  	engine->flags |= I915_ENGINE_HAS_PREEMPTION;
@@ -656,6 +655,7 @@ int intel_guc_submission_setup(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
  	GEM_BUG_ON(INTEL_GEN(i915) < 11);
tasklet_setup(&engine->sched.tasklet, guc_submission_tasklet);
+	__set_bit(I915_SCHED_ACTIVE_BIT, &engine->sched.flags);
guc_default_vfuncs(engine);
  	guc_default_irqs(engine);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
index 8d9e59e3cdcb..8eea25cb043e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
@@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ i915_request_active_timeline(const struct i915_request *rq)
static inline bool i915_request_use_scheduler(const struct i915_request *rq)
  {
-	return intel_engine_has_scheduler(rq->engine);
+	return i915_sched_is_active(i915_request_get_scheduler(rq));
  }
static inline bool i915_request_is_executing(const struct i915_request *rq)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
index af3a12d6f6d2..48336434bff3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ void i915_request_set_priority(struct i915_request *rq, int prio)
  	if (__i915_request_is_complete(rq))
  		goto unlock;
- if (!intel_engine_has_scheduler(engine)) {
+	if (!i915_sched_is_active(&engine->sched)) {
  		rq->sched.attr.priority = prio;
  		goto unlock;
  	}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h
index 685280d61581..cb1eddb7edc8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h
@@ -16,6 +16,10 @@
  struct drm_printer;
  struct i915_request;
+enum {
+	I915_SCHED_ACTIVE_BIT = 0,
+};
+
  /**
   * struct i915_sched - funnels requests towards hardware
   *
@@ -27,6 +31,7 @@ struct i915_request;
  struct i915_sched {
  	spinlock_t lock; /* protects the scheduling lists and queue */
+ unsigned long flags;
  	unsigned long mask; /* available scheduling channels */
/*
@@ -174,4 +179,9 @@ struct i915_dependency {
  				&(rq__)->sched.signalers_list, \
  				signal_link)
+static inline bool i915_sched_is_active(const struct i915_sched *se)
+{
+	return test_bit(I915_SCHED_ACTIVE_BIT, &se->flags);
+}

What do you have in mind for the distinction between "has scheduler" and "scheduler is active"?

Regards,

Tvrtko

+
  #endif /* _I915_SCHEDULER_TYPES_H_ */

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux