Quoting Chris Wilson (2021-02-02 21:24:16) > Quoting Chris Wilson (2021-02-02 21:14:35) > > Quoting Chris Wilson (2021-02-02 17:43:53) > > > Let's see how horrible it is to cycle elements on defer. (Curse the > > > irqlock pollution.) > > > > While that did work. I do not have a good idea on how to do list > > rotation on an RCU list. I can see that it must require a pair of > > synchronize_rcu, and that spells disaster (at least for handling it > > inline). > > > > Another way might be to randomize the deadlines along each branch to the > > tree... Except we don't have deadlines at this point and we can't so > > freely change the priorities. > > Speaking of which, this is 'fixed' by the deadlines as there we will > reorder ELSP as the test expects. (Which is why I didn't notice this for > so long.) And I thinks that's how I am going to handle this, by deferring the dfs fix for defer_request until we are ready with deadlines. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
