Re: [PATCH 17/57] drm/i915: Extract request suspension from the execlists

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 02/02/2021 13:26, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-02-02 13:15:52)

On 01/02/2021 08:56, Chris Wilson wrote:
+void __i915_sched_resume_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+                              struct i915_request *rq)
+{
+     LIST_HEAD(list);
+
+     lockdep_assert_held(&engine->active.lock);
+
+     if (rq_prio(rq) > engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint) {
+             engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint = rq_prio(rq);
+             tasklet_hi_schedule(&engine->execlists.tasklet);
+     }
+
+     if (!i915_request_on_hold(rq))
+             return;
+
+     ENGINE_TRACE(engine, "resuming request %llx:%lld\n",
+                  rq->fence.context, rq->fence.seqno);
+
+     /*
+      * Move this request back to the priority queue, and all of its
+      * children and grandchildren that were suspended along with it.
+      */
+     do {
+             struct i915_dependency *p;
+
+             RQ_TRACE(rq, "hold release\n");
+
+             GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_on_hold(rq));
+             GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_sw_fence_signaled(&rq->submit));
+
+             i915_request_clear_hold(rq);
+             list_del_init(&rq->sched.link);
+
+             queue_request(engine, rq);
+
+             /* Also release any children on this engine that are ready */
+             for_each_waiter(p, rq) {
+                     struct i915_request *w =
+                             container_of(p->waiter, typeof(*w), sched);
+
+                     if (p->flags & I915_DEPENDENCY_WEAK)
+                             continue;
+
+                     /* Propagate any change in error status */
+                     if (rq->fence.error)
+                             i915_request_set_error_once(w, rq->fence.error);
+
+                     if (w->engine != engine)
+                             continue;
+
+                     /* We also treat the on-hold status as a visited bit */
+                     if (!i915_request_on_hold(w))
+                             continue;
+
+                     /* Check that no other parents are also on hold [BFS] */
+                     if (hold_request(w))
+                             continue;

hold_request() appears deleted in the patch so possible rebase error.

The secret is we get to de-duplicate after having duplicated
hold_request() in i915_scheduler in an earlier patch,
   drm/i915: Extract request submission from execlists

Pfft ancient history long forgotten..

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux