Quoting Jani Nikula (2021-01-22 09:35:42) > On Fri, 22 Jan 2021, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Let's not encourage everybody to build i915's debug code, and certainly > > not the build robots who need to scrutinise the production build. Since > > CI will complain if the debug build is broken, having the other build > > bots focus on the builds we don't cover ourselves should improve the > > build coverage. > > I don't disagree with this, although I wrote in another mail that I'm > not sure DRM_I915_DEBUG should select DRM_I915_WERROR. I think they > should be two separate things. DRM_I915_DEBUG is the CI catch-all, and so the build we recommend developers try at least once. But the original purpose of DRM_I915_DEBUG was to be able to switch on features for CI without having to bug Tomi. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
