Re: [PATCH v2 15/17] drm/i915/pps: move pps code over from intel_display.c and refactor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 13 Jan 2021, Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2021-01-08 at 19:44:23 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> intel_display.c has some pps functions that belong to intel_pps.c. Move
>> them over.
>> 
>> While at it, refactor the duplicate intel_pps_init() in intel_display.c
>> into an orthogonal intel_pps_setup() in intel_pps.c, and call it earlier
>> in intel_modeset_init_nogem().
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 41 ++------------------
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h |  1 -
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c     | 34 ++++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h     |  3 ++
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c              |  1 +
>>  5 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> index 0189d379a55e..f8806c4ecb21 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@
>>  #include "intel_overlay.h"
>>  #include "intel_pipe_crc.h"
>>  #include "intel_pm.h"
>> +#include "intel_pps.h"
>>  #include "intel_psr.h"
>>  #include "intel_quirks.h"
>>  #include "intel_sideband.h"
>> @@ -16100,48 +16101,12 @@ static bool intel_ddi_crt_present(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>  	return true;
>>  }
>>  
>> -void intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> -{
>> -	int pps_num;
>> -	int pps_idx;
>> -
>> -	if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv))
>> -		return;
>> -	/*
>> -	 * This w/a is needed at least on CPT/PPT, but to be sure apply it
>> -	 * everywhere where registers can be write protected.
>> -	 */
>> -	if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
>> -		pps_num = 2;
>> -	else
>> -		pps_num = 1;
>> -
>> -	for (pps_idx = 0; pps_idx < pps_num; pps_idx++) {
>> -		u32 val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, PP_CONTROL(pps_idx));
>> -
>> -		val = (val & ~PANEL_UNLOCK_MASK) | PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS;
>> -		intel_de_write(dev_priv, PP_CONTROL(pps_idx), val);
>> -	}
>> -}
>> -
>> -static void intel_pps_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> -{
>> -	if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv) || IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
>> -		dev_priv->pps_mmio_base = PCH_PPS_BASE;
>> -	else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
>> -		dev_priv->pps_mmio_base = VLV_PPS_BASE;
>> -	else
>> -		dev_priv->pps_mmio_base = PPS_BASE;
>> -
>> -	intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(dev_priv);
>> -}
>> -
>>  static void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>  {
>>  	struct intel_encoder *encoder;
>>  	bool dpd_is_edp = false;
>>  
>> -	intel_pps_init(dev_priv);
>> +	intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(dev_priv);
>>  
>>  	if (!HAS_DISPLAY(dev_priv))
>>  		return;
>> @@ -17199,6 +17164,8 @@ int intel_modeset_init_nogem(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>>  
>>  	intel_panel_sanitize_ssc(i915);
>>  
>> +	intel_pps_setup(i915);
>> +
> This is mmio init, could you please guide me why i915_driver_mmio_probe()
> has not chosen to call intel_pps_setup() ?

Long term the goal is to divide gt and display probe more and more;
there's no clear place in i915_driver_mmio_probe() to stick this. I
certainly don't want to call intel_pps_setup() directly from there.

This is at least close to where gpio_mmio_base gets setup in
intel_gmbus_setup() right below.

BR,
Jani.

>>  	intel_gmbus_setup(i915);
>>  
>>  	drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "%d display pipe%s available.\n",
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
>> index 7ddbc00a0f41..bbd5dbc61ce9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
>> @@ -546,7 +546,6 @@ unsigned int intel_rotation_info_size(const struct intel_rotation_info *rot_info
>>  unsigned int intel_remapped_info_size(const struct intel_remapped_info *rem_info);
>>  bool intel_has_pending_fb_unpin(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>  int intel_display_suspend(struct drm_device *dev);
>> -void intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>  void intel_encoder_destroy(struct drm_encoder *encoder);
>>  struct drm_display_mode *
>>  intel_encoder_current_mode(struct intel_encoder *encoder);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
>> index b4d026ca3313..c3a0fc933500 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
>> @@ -1370,3 +1370,37 @@ void intel_pps_init(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>  
>>  	intel_pps_encoder_reset(intel_dp);
>>  }
>> +
>> +void intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> +{
>> +	int pps_num;
>> +	int pps_idx;
>> +
>> +	if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv))
>> +		return;
>> +	/*
>> +	 * This w/a is needed at least on CPT/PPT, but to be sure apply it
>> +	 * everywhere where registers can be write protected.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
>> +		pps_num = 2;
>> +	else
>> +		pps_num = 1;
>> +
>> +	for (pps_idx = 0; pps_idx < pps_num; pps_idx++) {
>> +		u32 val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, PP_CONTROL(pps_idx));
>> +
>> +		val = (val & ~PANEL_UNLOCK_MASK) | PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS;
>> +		intel_de_write(dev_priv, PP_CONTROL(pps_idx), val);
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>> +void intel_pps_setup(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> +{
>> +	if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(i915) || IS_GEN9_LP(i915))
>> +		i915->pps_mmio_base = PCH_PPS_BASE;
>> +	else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(i915) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(i915))
>> +		i915->pps_mmio_base = VLV_PPS_BASE;
>> +	else
>> +		i915->pps_mmio_base = PPS_BASE;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
>> index 22045c5cdc86..fbbcca782e7b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
>> @@ -46,4 +46,7 @@ void intel_pps_reset_all(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>>  void vlv_pps_init(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>>  		  const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>>  
>> +void intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>> +void intel_pps_setup(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>> +
>>  #endif /* __INTEL_PPS_H__ */
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>> index 3e504247f2da..7282c8f08318 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
>>  #include "display/intel_hotplug.h"
>>  #include "display/intel_overlay.h"
>>  #include "display/intel_pipe_crc.h"
>> +#include "display/intel_pps.h"
>>  #include "display/intel_sprite.h"
>>  #include "display/intel_vga.h"
>>  
>> -- 
>> 2.20.1
>> 

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux