On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 at 10:10, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The caller determines if the failure is an error or not, so avoid > warning when we will try again and succeed. For example, > > <7> [111.319321] [drm:intel_guc_fw_upload [i915]] GuC status 0x20 > <3> [111.319340] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* GuC load failed: status = 0x00000020 > <3> [111.319606] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* GuC load failed: status: Reset = 0, BootROM = 0x10, UKernel = 0x00, MIA = 0x00, Auth = 0x00 > <7> [111.320045] [drm:__uc_init_hw [i915]] GuC fw load failed: -110; will reset and retry 2 more time(s) > <7> [111.322978] [drm:intel_guc_fw_upload [i915]] GuC status 0x8002f0ec > > should not have been reported as a _test_ failure, as the GuC was > successfully loaded on the second attempt and the system remained > operational. > > Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2797 > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
