Re: [PATCH 1/2] i915/perf: Move gen specific OA formats to single array

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 15/12/2020 21:49, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
Variations in OA formats in the different gens has led to creation of
several sparse arrays to store the formats.

Move oa formats into a single array and add the supported range of
platforms for the oa formats.

Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c       | 56 ++++++++++++--------------
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf_types.h |  3 ++
  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
index f553caf4b06d..afa92cf075c4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
@@ -298,28 +298,27 @@ static u32 i915_oa_max_sample_rate = 100000;
/* XXX: beware if future OA HW adds new report formats that the current
   * code assumes all reports have a power-of-two size and ~(size - 1) can
- * be used as a mask to align the OA tail pointer.
+ * be used as a mask to align the OA tail pointer. Note that the platforms
+ * in this array specify a range (inclusive of start and end).
   */
-static const struct i915_oa_format hsw_oa_formats[I915_OA_FORMAT_MAX] = {
-	[I915_OA_FORMAT_A13]	    = { 0, 64 },
-	[I915_OA_FORMAT_A29]	    = { 1, 128 },
-	[I915_OA_FORMAT_A13_B8_C8]  = { 2, 128 },
-	/* A29_B8_C8 Disallowed as 192 bytes doesn't factor into buffer size */
-	[I915_OA_FORMAT_B4_C8]	    = { 4, 64 },
-	[I915_OA_FORMAT_A45_B8_C8]  = { 5, 256 },
-	[I915_OA_FORMAT_B4_C8_A16]  = { 6, 128 },
-	[I915_OA_FORMAT_C4_B8]	    = { 7, 64 },
-};
-
-static const struct i915_oa_format gen8_plus_oa_formats[I915_OA_FORMAT_MAX] = {
-	[I915_OA_FORMAT_A12]		    = { 0, 64 },
-	[I915_OA_FORMAT_A12_B8_C8]	    = { 2, 128 },
-	[I915_OA_FORMAT_A32u40_A4u32_B8_C8] = { 5, 256 },
-	[I915_OA_FORMAT_C4_B8]		    = { 7, 64 },
-};
-
-static const struct i915_oa_format gen12_oa_formats[I915_OA_FORMAT_MAX] = {
-	[I915_OA_FORMAT_A32u40_A4u32_B8_C8] = { 5, 256 },
+static const struct i915_oa_format oa_formats[I915_OA_FORMAT_MAX] = {
+	/* haswell */
+	[I915_OA_FORMAT_A13]                    = { 0, 64, INTEL_IVYBRIDGE, INTEL_HASWELL },
+	[I915_OA_FORMAT_A29]                    = { 1, 128, INTEL_IVYBRIDGE, INTEL_HASWELL },
+	[I915_OA_FORMAT_A13_B8_C8]              = { 2, 128, INTEL_IVYBRIDGE, INTEL_HASWELL },
+	[I915_OA_FORMAT_B4_C8]                  = { 4, 64, INTEL_IVYBRIDGE, INTEL_HASWELL },
+	[I915_OA_FORMAT_A45_B8_C8]              = { 5, 256, INTEL_IVYBRIDGE, INTEL_HASWELL },
+	[I915_OA_FORMAT_B4_C8_A16]              = { 6, 128, INTEL_IVYBRIDGE, INTEL_HASWELL },
+
+	/* haswell+ upto but not including tigerlake */
+	[I915_OA_FORMAT_C4_B8]                  = { 7, 64, INTEL_IVYBRIDGE, INTEL_TIGERLAKE - 1 },
+
+	/* gen8+ upto but not including tigerlake */
+	[I915_OA_FORMAT_A12]                    = { 0, 64, INTEL_BROADWELL, INTEL_TIGERLAKE - 1 },
+	[I915_OA_FORMAT_A12_B8_C8]              = { 2, 128, INTEL_BROADWELL, INTEL_TIGERLAKE - 1 },
+
+	/* gen8+ */
+	[I915_OA_FORMAT_A32u40_A4u32_B8_C8]     = { 5, 256, INTEL_BROADWELL, INTEL_MAX_PLATFORMS - 1 },
  };
#define SAMPLE_OA_REPORT (1<<0)
@@ -3575,6 +3574,7 @@ static int read_properties_unlocked(struct i915_perf *perf,
  	for (i = 0; i < n_props; i++) {
  		u64 oa_period, oa_freq_hz;
  		u64 id, value;
+		enum intel_platform p = INTEL_INFO(perf->i915)->platform;
ret = get_user(id, uprop);
  		if (ret)
@@ -3611,8 +3611,9 @@ static int read_properties_unlocked(struct i915_perf *perf,
  					  value);
  				return -EINVAL;
  			}
-			if (!perf->oa_formats[value].size) {
-				DRM_DEBUG("Unsupported OA report format %llu\n",
+			if (p < perf->oa_formats[value].start ||
+			    p > perf->oa_formats[value].end) {
+				DRM_DEBUG("OA report format not supported %llu\n",
  					  value);
  				return -EINVAL;
  			}
@@ -4270,6 +4271,7 @@ void i915_perf_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
/* XXX const struct i915_perf_ops! */ + perf->oa_formats = oa_formats;
  	if (IS_HASWELL(i915)) {
  		perf->ops.is_valid_b_counter_reg = gen7_is_valid_b_counter_addr;
  		perf->ops.is_valid_mux_reg = hsw_is_valid_mux_addr;
@@ -4280,8 +4282,6 @@ void i915_perf_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
  		perf->ops.oa_disable = gen7_oa_disable;
  		perf->ops.read = gen7_oa_read;
  		perf->ops.oa_hw_tail_read = gen7_oa_hw_tail_read;
-
-		perf->oa_formats = hsw_oa_formats;
  	} else if (HAS_LOGICAL_RING_CONTEXTS(i915)) {
  		/* Note: that although we could theoretically also support the
  		 * legacy ringbuffer mode on BDW (and earlier iterations of
@@ -4292,8 +4292,6 @@ void i915_perf_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
  		perf->ops.read = gen8_oa_read;
if (IS_GEN_RANGE(i915, 8, 9)) {
-			perf->oa_formats = gen8_plus_oa_formats;
-
  			perf->ops.is_valid_b_counter_reg =
  				gen7_is_valid_b_counter_addr;
  			perf->ops.is_valid_mux_reg =
@@ -4324,8 +4322,6 @@ void i915_perf_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
  				perf->gen8_valid_ctx_bit = BIT(16);
  			}
  		} else if (IS_GEN_RANGE(i915, 10, 11)) {
-			perf->oa_formats = gen8_plus_oa_formats;
-
  			perf->ops.is_valid_b_counter_reg =
  				gen7_is_valid_b_counter_addr;
  			perf->ops.is_valid_mux_reg =
@@ -4348,8 +4344,6 @@ void i915_perf_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
  			}
  			perf->gen8_valid_ctx_bit = BIT(16);
  		} else if (IS_GEN(i915, 12)) {
-			perf->oa_formats = gen12_oa_formats;
-
  			perf->ops.is_valid_b_counter_reg =
  				gen12_is_valid_b_counter_addr;
  			perf->ops.is_valid_mux_reg =
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf_types.h
index a36a455ae336..84dceb743ebc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf_types.h
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
  #include "gt/intel_sseu.h"
  #include "i915_reg.h"
  #include "intel_wakeref.h"
+#include "intel_device_info.h"
struct drm_i915_private;
  struct file;
@@ -32,6 +33,8 @@ struct intel_engine_cs;
  struct i915_oa_format {
  	u32 format;
  	int size;
+	enum intel_platform start;
+	enum intel_platform end;

As a drive by only - I question the concept of thinking about platforms enums as ordered and having things like INTEL_TIGERLAKE - 1 in the code. It's completely novel concept and I think fragile. Order there is purely the order of upstreaming and not stable.

Suggestions wise, if the rules are Gen based you could use a mask, but if they are truly platform based then it is more tricky. However current code does use gen ranges to assign them, so would a genmask really not fit?

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux