Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/4] i915/perf_pmu: Verify RC6 measurements before/after suspend

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 14/12/2020 10:51, Chris Wilson wrote:
RC6 should work before suspend, and continue to increment while idle
after suspend. Should.

v2: Include a longer sleep after suspend; it appears we are reticent to
idle so soon after waking up.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  tests/i915/perf_pmu.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
index cb7273142..0b470c1bc 100644
--- a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
+++ b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
@@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ static unsigned int measured_usleep(unsigned int usec)
  #define TEST_RUNTIME_PM (8)
  #define FLAG_LONG (16)
  #define FLAG_HANG (32)
+#define TEST_S3 (64)
static igt_spin_t * __spin_poll(int fd, uint32_t ctx,
  				const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e)
@@ -1578,7 +1579,7 @@ test_frequency_idle(int gem_fd)
  		     "Actual frequency should be 0 while parked!\n");
  }
-static bool wait_for_rc6(int fd)
+static bool wait_for_rc6(int fd, int timeout)
  {
  	struct timespec tv = {};
  	uint64_t start, now;
@@ -1594,7 +1595,7 @@ static bool wait_for_rc6(int fd)
  		now = pmu_read_single(fd);
  		if (now - start > 1e6)
  			return true;
-	} while (!igt_seconds_elapsed(&tv));
+	} while (igt_seconds_elapsed(&tv) <= timeout);
return false;
  }
@@ -1636,14 +1637,32 @@ test_rc6(int gem_fd, unsigned int flags)
  		}
  	}
- igt_require(wait_for_rc6(fd));
+	igt_require(wait_for_rc6(fd, 1));
/* While idle check full RC6. */
  	prev = __pmu_read_single(fd, &ts[0]);
  	slept = measured_usleep(duration_ns / 1000);
  	idle = __pmu_read_single(fd, &ts[1]);
+
  	igt_debug("slept=%lu perf=%"PRIu64"\n", slept, ts[1] - ts[0]);
+	assert_within_epsilon(idle - prev, ts[1] - ts[0], tolerance);
+
+	if (flags & TEST_S3) {
+		prev = __pmu_read_single(fd, &ts[0]);
+		igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_MEM,
+					      SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
+		idle = __pmu_read_single(fd, &ts[1]);
+		igt_debug("suspend=%"PRIu64"\n", ts[1] - ts[0]);
+		//assert_within_epsilon(idle - prev, ts[1] - ts[0], tolerance);
+	}
+
+	igt_assert(wait_for_rc6(fd, 5));
+ prev = __pmu_read_single(fd, &ts[0]);
+	slept = measured_usleep(duration_ns / 1000);
+	idle = __pmu_read_single(fd, &ts[1]);
+
+	igt_debug("slept=%lu perf=%"PRIu64"\n", slept, ts[1] - ts[0]);

You plan to leave the C++ bit commented out above and just check it here? Doesn't seem it harms to check twice in the non-S3 case anyway, just asking.

Regards,

Tvrtko

  	assert_within_epsilon(idle - prev, ts[1] - ts[0], tolerance);
/* Wake up device and check no RC6. */
@@ -2245,6 +2264,9 @@ igt_main
  	igt_subtest("rc6-runtime-pm-long")
  		test_rc6(fd, TEST_RUNTIME_PM | FLAG_LONG);
+ igt_subtest("rc6-suspend")
+		test_rc6(fd, TEST_S3);
+
  	/**
  	 * Check render nodes are counted.
  	 */

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux