On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 04:16:36PM -0500, Sean Paul wrote: > From: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > No need to spam syslog/console when we can ignore/fix the flag. besides that we are calling from multiple places anyway.. > > Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c > index 4346bc1a747a..27dc2dad6809 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c > @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ static u32 tc_port_live_status_mask(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port) > mask |= BIT(TC_PORT_LEGACY); > > /* The sink can be connected only in a single mode. */ > - if (!drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, hweight32(mask) > 1)) > + if (!drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(&i915->drm, hweight32(mask) > 1)) > tc_port_fixup_legacy_flag(dig_port, mask); > > return mask; > -- > Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
