Quoting trix@xxxxxxxxxx (2020-11-27 16:28:28) > From: Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx> > > The macro use will already have a semicolon. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c > index e67cec8fa2aa..ef767f04c37c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c > @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void intel_device_info_print_static(const struct intel_device_info *info, > drm_printf(p, "ppgtt-type: %d\n", info->ppgtt_type); > drm_printf(p, "dma_mask_size: %u\n", info->dma_mask_size); > > -#define PRINT_FLAG(name) drm_printf(p, "%s: %s\n", #name, yesno(info->name)); > +#define PRINT_FLAG(name) drm_printf(p, "%s: %s\n", #name, yesno(info->name)) > DEV_INFO_FOR_EACH_FLAG(PRINT_FLAG); I thought that this was a macro that avoided adding the ';' to each invocation. Perhaps another time. Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
