Quoting Matthew Auld (2020-11-27 12:06:13) > From: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski@xxxxxxxxx> > > IGTs should be able to choose testing strategy depending on memory > regions and its sizes. Add region instance number to make this > easier and descriptive. > > Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Adam Miszczak <adam.miszczak@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.c > index 1f26bc06ec20..cea44ddebe46 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.c > @@ -329,6 +329,10 @@ int intel_memory_regions_hw_probe(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > mem->instance = instance; > mem->gt = &i915->gt; > > + if (HAS_LMEM(mem->i915) && type != INTEL_MEMORY_SYSTEM) > + intel_memory_region_set_name(mem, "%s%u", > + mem->name, mem->instance); sprintf(mem->name, "%s", mem->name) is that even defined behaviour? -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
