Quoting Lucas De Marchi (2020-11-24 19:13:15) > intel_gt_driver_register() may be called earlier than > intel_opregion_register() and acpi_video_register(), so move it up. > > intel_display_debugfs_register() may be called later, together with the > other display-related initializations. There is a slight change in > behavior that sysfs files will show up before the display-related > debugfs files, but that shouldn't be a problem - userspace shouldn't be > relying in debugfs. > > This allows us to group all the display-related calls under a single > check for "HAS_DISPLAY()" that can be later moved to a better place. > > Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx> They do seem to be independent and movable, Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
