Re: [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915/gt: Move the breadcrumb to the signaler if completed upon cancel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 24/11/2020 11:42, Chris Wilson wrote:
If while we are cancelling the breadcrumb signaling, we find that the
request is already completed, move it to the irq signaler and let it be
signaled.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c
index a24cc1ff08a0..f5f6feed0fa6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c
@@ -363,6 +363,14 @@ void intel_breadcrumbs_free(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b)
  	kfree(b);
  }
+static void irq_signal_request(struct i915_request *rq,
+			       struct intel_breadcrumbs *b)
+{
+	if (__signal_request(rq) &&
+	    llist_add(&rq->signal_node, &b->signaled_requests))
+		irq_work_queue(&b->irq_work);
+}
+
  static void insert_breadcrumb(struct i915_request *rq)
  {
  	struct intel_breadcrumbs *b = READ_ONCE(rq->engine)->breadcrumbs;
@@ -380,9 +388,7 @@ static void insert_breadcrumb(struct i915_request *rq)
  	 * its signal completion.
  	 */
  	if (__request_completed(rq)) {
-		if (__signal_request(rq) &&
-		    llist_add(&rq->signal_node, &b->signaled_requests))
-			irq_work_queue(&b->irq_work);
+		irq_signal_request(rq, b);
  		return;
  	}
@@ -453,6 +459,7 @@ bool i915_request_enable_breadcrumb(struct i915_request *rq) void i915_request_cancel_breadcrumb(struct i915_request *rq)
  {
+	struct intel_breadcrumbs *b = READ_ONCE(rq->engine)->breadcrumbs;
  	struct intel_context *ce = rq->context;
  	bool release;
@@ -461,11 +468,16 @@ void i915_request_cancel_breadcrumb(struct i915_request *rq) spin_lock(&ce->signal_lock);
  	list_del_rcu(&rq->signal_link);
-	release = remove_signaling_context(rq->engine->breadcrumbs, ce);
+	release = remove_signaling_context(b, ce);
  	spin_unlock(&ce->signal_lock);
  	if (release)
  		intel_context_put(ce);
+ if (__request_completed(rq)) {
+		irq_signal_request(rq, b);
+		return;

This is a bit unintuitive - irq_signal_request does things conditionally based on the signaled flag, but here the return value is ignored and reference kept regardless. Which makes me wonder how can the combo of the two always dtrt. Because __request_completed is seqno based, which can happen before setting the signaled flag. Like if retire races with breadcrumbs. Am I missing something?

Regards,

Tvrtko

+	}
+
  	i915_request_put(rq);
  }
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux