On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:54:44AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Since I butchered this I figured better to make sure we have testcases > for this now. Since we only have a locking context for __GFP_FS that's > the only thing we're testing right now. > > Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx> > Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Thomas Hellström (Intel) <thomas_os@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> > Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > --- > lib/locking-selftest.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+) I have a few changes pending for this file, I don't think the conflicts will be bad, but.. In any case: Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
