Re: [CI 00/15] Rebased remaining big joiner series

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Navare, Manasi (2020-11-19 05:58:03)
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 11:49:25AM -0800, Navare, Manasi wrote:
> > Series pushed to dinq
> > 
> > Manasi
> 
> By Chris Wilson:
> 
> Oops on boot:
> 
> <1>[   44.315382] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffc90049e02100
> <1>[   44.315422] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> <1>[   44.315442] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> <6>[   44.315462] PGD 100000067 P4D 100000067 PUD 0
> <4>[   44.315497] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
> <4>[   44.315522] CPU: 7 PID: 276 Comm: systemd-udevd Tainted: G     U            5.10.0-rc3-CI-CI_DRM_9355+ #1
> <4>[   44.315552] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Tiger Lake Client Platform/TigerLake Y LPDDR4x T4 Crb, BIOS TGLSFWI1.R00.2527.A03.2001170231 01/17/2020
> <4>[   44.315981] RIP: 0010:gen12_fwtable_read32+0x6f/0x2f0 [i915]
> <4>[   44.316016] Code: c6 48 8b 43 08 8b b0 98 0d 00 00 85 f6 0f 85 53 01 00 00 89 ee 48 89 df e8 fe a6 ff ff 85 c0 0f 85 bc 00 00 00 89 e8 48 03 03 <44> 8b 38 48 8b 43 08 8b 90 98 0d 00 00 85 d2 0f 85 a8 01 00 00 4c
> 16893]  hsw_crtc_enable+0x188/0x780 [i915]
> <4>[   44.317423]  intel_enable_crtc+0x56/0x70 [i915]
> <4>[   44.317931]  skl_commit_modeset_enables+0x34a/0x530 [i915]
> <4>[   44.318444]  intel_atomic_commit_tail+0x3a0/0x1330 [i915]
> <4>[   44.318488]  ? queue_work_on+0x5e/0x70
> <4>[   44.318965]  intel_atomic_commit+0x371/0x3f0 [i915]
> <4>[   44.319458]  intel_initial_commit+0x156/0x1e0 [i915]
> <4>[   44.319949]  intel_modeset_init_nogem+0xb59/0x1c00 [i915]
> <4>[   44.320336]  i915_driver_probe+0x79c/0xd90 [i915]
> <4>[   44.320374]  ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x4f/0x80
> <4>[   44.320741]  i915_pci_probe+0x43/0x1d0 [i915]
> <4>[   44.320772]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2f/0x50
> <4>[   44.320804]  pci_device_probe+0x9e/0x110
> <4>[   44.320830]  really_probe+0x1c4/0x430
> <4>[   44.320852]  driver_probe_device+0xd9/0x140
> <4>[   44.320875]  device_driver_attach+0x4a/0x50
> <4>[   44.320897]  __driver_attach+0x83/0x140
> <4>[   44.320917]  ? device_driver_attach+0x50/0x50
> <4>[   44.320938]  ? device_driver_attach+0x50/0x50
> 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 1f f6 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> <4>[   44.321749] RSP: 002b:00007ffda8ea9358 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139
> <4>[   44.321782] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000056004d10ffc0 RCX: 00007fad885f5839
> <4>[   44.321808] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000056004d0f5490 RDI: 000000000000000f
> <4>[   44.321834] RBP: 000056004d0f5490 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffda8ea9470
> <4>[   44.321859] R10: 000000000000000f R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
> <4>[   44.321884] R13: 000056004d0f20c0 R14: 0000000000020000 R15: 0000000000000000
> <4>[   44.321921] Modules linked in: i915(+) mei_hdcp x86_pkg_temp_thermal coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul snd_hda_intel snd_intel_dspcfg ghash_clmulni_intel snd_hda_codec cdc_ether snd_hwdep usbnet snd_hda_core mii e1000e ptp snd_pcm pps_core mei_me mei prime_numbers intel_lpss_pci(+)
> <4>[   44.322105] CR2: ffffc90049e02100
> <4>[   44.322130] ---[ end trace 87c6ef683da5ac08 ]---
> 
> 
> But Chris, we havent seen this on CI nor in our testing.

This is CI. CI is also reporting massive display powerwell breakage.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux