On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 05:17:15PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 04:24:15PM -0800, Navare, Manasi wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 12:03:52AM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > When using bigjoiner userspace is only controlling the "master"
> > > plane, so use its uapi state for the "slave" plane as well.
> > >
> > > hw.crtc needs a bit of magic since we don't want to copy that from
> > > the uapi state (as it points to the wrong pipe for the "slave
> > > " plane). Instead we pass the right crtc in explicitly but only
> > > assign it when the uapi state indicates the plane to be logically
> > > enabled (ie. uapi.crtc != NULL).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c | 59 +++++++++++++------
> > > .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.h | 3 +-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 5 +-
> > > 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
> > > index f47558efb3c2..7abb0e3d6c0b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
> > > @@ -247,11 +247,19 @@ static void intel_plane_clear_hw_state(struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
> > > }
> > >
> > > void intel_plane_copy_uapi_to_hw_state(struct intel_plane_state *plane_state,
> > > - const struct intel_plane_state *from_plane_state)
> > > + const struct intel_plane_state *from_plane_state,
> > > + struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> > > {
> > > intel_plane_clear_hw_state(plane_state);
> > >
> > > - plane_state->hw.crtc = from_plane_state->uapi.crtc;
> > > + /*
> > > + * For the bigjoiner slave uapi.crtc will point at
> > > + * the master crtc. So we explicitly assign the right
> > > + * slave crtc to hw.crtc. uapi.crtc!=NULL simply indicates
> > > + * the plane is logically enabled on the uapi level.
> > > + */
> > > + plane_state->hw.crtc = from_plane_state->uapi.crtc ? &crtc->base : NULL;
> >
> > But here in case of bigjoiner_slave we actualy compute new_master_plane_state from master_plane which is
> > obtained from the slaves linked crtc.
> >
> > So here, even for the slave plane's hw.crtc we are using master's uapi.crtc? Is that what is happening here?
>
> Yes.
Ok gotcha
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx>
Manasi
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
