Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-11-17 12:33:11) > > On 17/11/2020 12:18, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-11-17 11:40:50) > >> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> -L and -D <device> on the command line. > >> > >> With no device specified tool tries to find i915 discrete or integrated in > >> that order. > > > > Ok, looks straightforward enough. (I still like having an idiot's guide > > with examples of -L output and what to pass to -D). > > > >> + fd = igt_open_card(&card); > >> + igt_require(fd); > > > > Does igt_require() still generate weirdness when used outside of igt > > tests? > > It appears to do nothing. But more importantly I don't know how I ended > up with it here. Probably some copy & paste again. > > > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Can I convert to igt_assert and keep the r-b? Make it return sensibly with a wsim_err. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
