Re: [CI 2/2] drm/i915/gem: Pull phys pread/pwrite implementations to the backend

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 06:41:25PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Chris Wilson (2020-11-05 15:49:34)
> > Move the specialised interactions with the physical GEM object from the
> > pread/pwrite ioctl handler into the phys backend.

which depends on the backend...

> > 
> 
> Fixes: c6790dc22312 ("drm/i915: Wean off drm_pci_alloc/drm_pci_free")

which was a fixes to 4.5 stable, but I could only find it into 5.4+
so...

> Testcase: igt/gem_pwrite/exhaustion
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

When cherry-picking to drm-intel-fixes, should I add

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 5.4.y: c6790dc22312: drm/i915: Wean off drm_pci_alloc/drm_pci_free
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 5.4.y

> -Chris
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux