On Fri, 2020-11-06 at 14:55 -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> !HAS_DISPLAY() implies !HAS_OVERLAY(), skipping overlay setup anyway, so
> return earlier from intel_modeset_init() for clarity.
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index b6a9d41a043e..b3e6c43f0cb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -18364,11 +18364,11 @@ int intel_modeset_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> {
> int ret;
>
>
>
>
> - intel_overlay_setup(i915);
> -
> if (!HAS_DISPLAY(i915))
> return 0;
>
>
>
>
> + intel_overlay_setup(i915);
> +
> ret = intel_fbdev_init(&i915->drm);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
