Re: [PATCH v4 31/61] drm/i915: Prepare for obj->mm.lock removal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 10/16/20 12:44 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
From: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@xxxxxxxxx>

Stolen objects need to lock, and we may call put_pages when
refcount drops to 0, ensure all calls are handled correctly.

Idea-from: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c  | 14 ++++++++++++--
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c | 10 +++++++++-
  3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
index 8db84ce09d9f..a3a701d849bf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
@@ -112,6 +112,20 @@ i915_gem_object_put(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
#define assert_object_held(obj) dma_resv_assert_held((obj)->base.resv) +/*
+ * If more than one potential simultaneous locker, assert held.
+ */
+static inline void assert_object_held_shared(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Note mm list lookup is protected by
+	 * kref_get_unless_zero().
+	 */
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) &&
+	    kref_read(&obj->base.refcount) > 0)
+		lockdep_assert_held(&obj->mm.lock);
+}
+
  static inline int __i915_gem_object_lock(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
  					 struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
  					 bool intr)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
index ef1d5fabd077..429ec652c394 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ void __i915_gem_object_set_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
  	unsigned long supported = INTEL_INFO(i915)->page_sizes;
  	int i;
- lockdep_assert_held(&obj->mm.lock);
+	assert_object_held_shared(obj);
if (i915_gem_object_is_volatile(obj))
  		obj->mm.madv = I915_MADV_DONTNEED;
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ void __i915_gem_object_set_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
  		struct list_head *list;
  		unsigned long flags;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&obj->mm.lock);
  		spin_lock_irqsave(&i915->mm.obj_lock, flags);
i915->mm.shrink_count++;
@@ -88,6 +89,8 @@ int ____i915_gem_object_get_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
  	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(obj->base.dev);
  	int err;
+ assert_object_held_shared(obj);
+
  	if (unlikely(obj->mm.madv != I915_MADV_WILLNEED)) {
  		drm_dbg(&i915->drm,
  			"Attempting to obtain a purgeable object\n");
@@ -115,6 +118,8 @@ int __i915_gem_object_get_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
  	if (err)
  		return err;
+ assert_object_held_shared(obj);
+
  	if (unlikely(!i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj))) {
  		GEM_BUG_ON(i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj));
@@ -142,7 +147,7 @@ void i915_gem_object_truncate(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
  /* Try to discard unwanted pages */
  void i915_gem_object_writeback(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
  {
-	lockdep_assert_held(&obj->mm.lock);
+	assert_object_held_shared(obj);
  	GEM_BUG_ON(i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj));
if (obj->ops->writeback)
@@ -175,6 +180,8 @@ __i915_gem_object_unset_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
  {
  	struct sg_table *pages;
+ assert_object_held_shared(obj);
+
  	pages = fetch_and_zero(&obj->mm.pages);
  	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pages))
  		return pages;
@@ -202,6 +209,9 @@ int __i915_gem_object_put_pages_locked(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
  	if (i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj))
  		return -EBUSY;
+ /* May be called by shrinker from within get_pages() (on another bo) */
+	assert_object_held_shared(obj);
+
  	i915_gem_object_release_mmap_offset(obj);
/*
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c
index 9a9242b5a99f..1fd287ce86f4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c
@@ -593,11 +593,19 @@ __i915_gem_object_create_stolen(struct intel_memory_region *mem,
  	cache_level = HAS_LLC(mem->i915) ? I915_CACHE_LLC : I915_CACHE_NONE;
  	i915_gem_object_set_cache_coherency(obj, cache_level);
+ if (WARN_ON(!i915_gem_object_trylock(obj))) {
+		err = -EBUSY;
+		goto cleanup;
+	}

We should probably keep the _isolated annotation here. I think it needs to be used elsewhere anyway.

Otherwise

Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux