On 10/19/2020 3:11 AM, Shankar, Uma wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Nautiyal, Ankit K <ankit.k.nautiyal@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 4:23 PM
To: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Shankar, Uma <uma.shankar@xxxxxxxxx>;
Kulkarni, Vandita <vandita.kulkarni@xxxxxxxxx>; ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
Sharma, Swati2 <swati2.sharma@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [RFC 04/13] drm/i915: Capture max frl rate for PCON in dfp cap structure
HDMI2.1 PCON advertises Max FRL bandwidth supported by the PCON and by the
sink.
This patch captures these in dfp cap structure in intel_dp and uses these to
prune connector modes that cannot be supported by the PCON and sink FRL
bandwidth.
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@xxxxxxxxx>
---
.../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
index 0b5df8e44966..e2f58d0575a2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
@@ -1398,6 +1398,7 @@ struct intel_dp {
struct {
int min_tmds_clock, max_tmds_clock;
int max_dotclock;
+int pcon_max_frl, sink_max_frl;
Append it with bw or rate.
Agreed, will add 'bw' for clarity.
u8 max_bpc;
bool ycbcr_444_to_420;
} dfp;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
index 0902a9aeeda1..cd6934f28f32 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
@@ -683,6 +683,24 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid_downstream(struct
intel_connector *connector,
const struct drm_display_info *info = &connector->base.display_info;
int tmds_clock;
+/* If PCON and HDMI2.1 sink both support FRL MODE, check FRL
Use multi line comment style.
Agreed. Will take care in next version.
+ * bandwidth constraints.
+ */
+if (intel_dp->dfp.pcon_max_frl) {
+int target_bw;
+int max_frl_bw;
+int bpp = intel_dp_mode_min_output_bpp(&connector->base,
mode);
+
+target_bw = bpp * DIV_ROUND_UP(target_clock, 1000000);
To avoid any roundup errors, it would be good to multiple max_frl_bw by 1000000 than dividing target_clock
Alright. Will take care of this in next version.
Thanks & Regards,
Ankit
+
+max_frl_bw = min(intel_dp->dfp.pcon_max_frl,
+ intel_dp->dfp.sink_max_frl);
+if (target_bw > max_frl_bw)
+return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
+
+return MODE_OK;
+}
+
if (intel_dp->dfp.max_dotclock &&
target_clock > intel_dp->dfp.max_dotclock)
return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
@@ -6383,13 +6401,21 @@ intel_dp_update_dfp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
intel_dp->downstream_ports,
edid);
+intel_dp->dfp.pcon_max_frl =
+drm_dp_get_pcon_max_frl_bw(intel_dp->dpcd,
+ intel_dp->downstream_ports);
+
+intel_dp->dfp.sink_max_frl =
+drm_dp_get_hdmi_max_frl_bw(&intel_dp->aux);
+
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
- "[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] DFP max bpc %d, max dotclock %d,
TMDS clock %d-%d\n",
+ "[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] DFP max bpc %d, max dotclock %d,
TMDS clock
+%d-%d, PCON Max FRL BW %dGbps, Sink Max FRL BW %dGbps\n",
connector->base.base.id, connector->base.name,
intel_dp->dfp.max_bpc,
intel_dp->dfp.max_dotclock,
intel_dp->dfp.min_tmds_clock,
- intel_dp->dfp.max_tmds_clock);
+ intel_dp->dfp.max_tmds_clock,
+ intel_dp->dfp.pcon_max_frl,
+ intel_dp->dfp.sink_max_frl);
}
static void
@@ -6479,6 +6505,9 @@ intel_dp_unset_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
intel_dp->dfp.min_tmds_clock = 0;
intel_dp->dfp.max_tmds_clock = 0;
+intel_dp->dfp.pcon_max_frl = 0;
+intel_dp->dfp.sink_max_frl = 0;
+
intel_dp->dfp.ycbcr_444_to_420 = false;
connector->base.ycbcr_420_allowed = false; }
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
