On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 07:56:49PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > The block comment for cnl_program_nearest_filter_coefs() has a wonderful > diagram, but although it is marked up as kerneldoc does not use the > markup for providing the function definition. > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c:6341: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev_priv' not described in 'cnl_program_nearest_filter_coefs' > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c:6341: warning: Function parameter or member 'pipe' not described in 'cnl_program_nearest_filter_coefs' > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c:6341: warning: Function parameter or member 'id' not described in 'cnl_program_nearest_filter_coefs' > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c:6341: warning: Function parameter or member 'set' not described in 'cnl_program_nearest_filter_coefs' > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > index 130303e0298a..6eff9a971d0b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > @@ -6299,7 +6299,7 @@ static u16 cnl_nearest_filter_coef(int t) > return t == 3 ? 0x0800 : 0x3000; > } > > -/** > +/* > * Theory behind setting nearest-neighbor integer scaling: > * > * 17 phase of 7 taps requires 119 coefficients in 60 dwords per set. > -- > 2.20.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Ville Syrjälä Intel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
