Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 01/10] i915/gem_userptr_blits: Tighten has_userptr()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 14/10/2020 11:40, Chris Wilson wrote:
We use has_userptr() to determine if the different flags are supported,
so it helps not to override the flags inside the test.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  tests/i915/gem_userptr_blits.c | 12 ++++++------
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_userptr_blits.c b/tests/i915/gem_userptr_blits.c
index 268423dcd..01498edad 100644
--- a/tests/i915/gem_userptr_blits.c
+++ b/tests/i915/gem_userptr_blits.c
@@ -71,8 +71,7 @@
  #define PAGE_SIZE 4096
  #endif
-static uint32_t userptr_flags = I915_USERPTR_UNSYNCHRONIZED;
-
+static uint32_t userptr_flags;
  static bool *can_mmap;
#define WIDTH 512
@@ -504,14 +503,11 @@ static int has_userptr(int fd)
  {
  	uint32_t handle = 0;
  	void *ptr;
-	uint32_t oldflags;
  	int ret;
igt_assert(posix_memalign(&ptr, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE) == 0);
-	oldflags = userptr_flags;
-	gem_userptr_test_unsynchronized();
  	ret = __gem_userptr(fd, ptr, PAGE_SIZE, 0, userptr_flags, &handle);
-	userptr_flags = oldflags;
+	errno = 0;
  	if (ret != 0) {
  		free(ptr);
  		return 0;
@@ -2112,6 +2108,10 @@ igt_main_args("c:", NULL, help_str, opt_handler, NULL)
igt_subtest_group {
  		igt_fixture {
+			/* Either mode will do for parameter checking */
+			gem_userptr_test_synchronized();
+			if (!has_userptr(fd))
+				gem_userptr_test_unsynchronized();
  			igt_require(has_userptr(fd));
  		}

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux