Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Make the GEM reclaim workqueue high priority

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris,
    I tested this patch. It is still not enough, I keep catch running out of lmem.  Every worker invocation takes larger and larger freeing object count.

Here is my debugging code:

+static int obj_count = 0;
+
......
+       if (llist_add(&obj->freed, &i915->mm.free_list)) {
+               bool b;
+               b = queue_work(i915->wq, &i915->mm.free_work);
+               pr_err("queue_work: %d, %d; %d\n", atomic_read(&i915->mm.free_count), obj_count, b);
+               obj_count = 1;
+       } else {
+               obj_count++;
+       }
	
And here  is the output:

[  821.213680] queue_work: 108068, 105764; 1
[  823.309468] queue_work: 148843, 147948; 1
[  826.453132] queue_work: 220000, 218123; 1
[  831.522506] queue_work: 334812, 333773; 1
[  840.040571] queue_work: 539650, 538922; 1
[  860.337644] queue_work: 960811, 1017158; 1

The second number, 'obj_count', is the objects taken by last worker invocation to free.

--CQ


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 3:33 AM
> To: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tang, CQ <cq.tang@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Make the GEM reclaim workqueue high priority
> 
> Since removing dev->struct_mutex usage, we only use i915->wq for batch
> freeing of GEM objects and ppGTT, it is essential for memory reclaim. If we
> let the workqueue dawdle, we trap excess amounts of memory, so give it a
> priority boost. Although since we no longer depend on a singular mutex, we
> could run unbounded, but first lets try to keep some constraint upon the
> worker.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 16 +++-------------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c index 8bb7e2dcfaaa..8c9198f0d2ad
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -219,20 +219,10 @@ intel_teardown_mchbar(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv)  static int i915_workqueues_init(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv)  {
>  	/*
> -	 * The i915 workqueue is primarily used for batched retirement of
> -	 * requests (and thus managing bo) once the task has been
> completed
> -	 * by the GPU. i915_retire_requests() is called directly when we
> -	 * need high-priority retirement, such as waiting for an explicit
> -	 * bo.
> -	 *
> -	 * It is also used for periodic low-priority events, such as
> -	 * idle-timers and recording error state.
> -	 *
> -	 * All tasks on the workqueue are expected to acquire the dev mutex
> -	 * so there is no point in running more than one instance of the
> -	 * workqueue at any time.  Use an ordered one.
> +	 * The i915 workqueue is primarily used for batched freeing of
> +	 * GEM objects and ppGTT, and is essential for memory reclaim.
>  	 */
> -	dev_priv->wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("i915", 0);
> +	dev_priv->wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("i915", WQ_HIGHPRI);
>  	if (dev_priv->wq == NULL)
>  		goto out_err;
> 
> --
> 2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux