On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 05:33:34PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Just like with the DDIs tgl+ renamed the AUX CHs to reflect the type of the DDI. Let's add the aliasing enum values for the type-C AUX CHs. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h | 8 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h index a39be3c9e0cf..cba876721ea0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h @@ -290,6 +290,14 @@ enum aux_ch { AUX_CH_G, AUX_CH_H, AUX_CH_I, + + /* tgl+ */ + AUX_CH_USBC1 = AUX_CH_D, + AUX_CH_USBC2, + AUX_CH_USBC3, + AUX_CH_USBC4, + AUX_CH_USBC5, + AUX_CH_USBC6, }; #define aux_ch_name(a) ((a) + 'A') diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c index 239016dcd544..a73c354c920e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c @@ -1792,7 +1792,6 @@ static i915_reg_t skl_aux_ctl_reg(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) case AUX_CH_D: case AUX_CH_E: case AUX_CH_F: - case AUX_CH_G: return DP_AUX_CH_CTL(aux_ch); default: MISSING_CASE(aux_ch); @@ -1813,7 +1812,52 @@ static i915_reg_t skl_aux_data_reg(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int index) case AUX_CH_D: case AUX_CH_E: case AUX_CH_F: - case AUX_CH_G: + return DP_AUX_CH_DATA(aux_ch, index); + default: + MISSING_CASE(aux_ch); + return DP_AUX_CH_DATA(AUX_CH_A, index); + } +} + +static i915_reg_t tgl_aux_ctl_reg(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) +{ + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp); + struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp); + enum aux_ch aux_ch = dig_port->aux_ch; + + switch (aux_ch) { + case AUX_CH_A: + case AUX_CH_B: + case AUX_CH_C: + case AUX_CH_USBC1: + case AUX_CH_USBC2: + case AUX_CH_USBC3: + case AUX_CH_USBC4: + case AUX_CH_USBC5: + case AUX_CH_USBC6: + return DP_AUX_CH_CTL(aux_ch); + default: + MISSING_CASE(aux_ch); + return DP_AUX_CH_CTL(AUX_CH_A); + } +} + +static i915_reg_t tgl_aux_data_reg(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int index) +{ + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp); + struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp); + enum aux_ch aux_ch = dig_port->aux_ch; + + switch (aux_ch) { + case AUX_CH_A: + case AUX_CH_B: + case AUX_CH_C: + case AUX_CH_USBC1: + case AUX_CH_USBC2: + case AUX_CH_USBC3: + case AUX_CH_USBC4: + case AUX_CH_USBC5: + case AUX_CH_USBC6: return DP_AUX_CH_DATA(aux_ch, index); default: MISSING_CASE(aux_ch); @@ -1834,7 +1878,10 @@ intel_dp_aux_init(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp); struct intel_encoder *encoder = &dig_port->base; - if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9) { + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12) { + intel_dp->aux_ch_ctl_reg = tgl_aux_ctl_reg;
why is this even a function pointer rather than just the reg? AFAICS it only depends on dig_port->aux_ch that is initialized in intel_ddi_init() but could be orthogonal to the change here. Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx> Lucas De Marchi
+ intel_dp->aux_ch_data_reg = tgl_aux_data_reg; + } else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9) { intel_dp->aux_ch_ctl_reg = skl_aux_ctl_reg; intel_dp->aux_ch_data_reg = skl_aux_data_reg; } else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv)) { -- 2.26.2 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx