Apply Display WA #22010492432 for combo PHY PLLs too. This should fix a
problem where the PLL output frequency is slightly off with the current
PLL fractional divider value.
I haven't seen an actual case where this causes a problem, but let's
follow the spec. It's also needed on some EHL platforms, but for that we
also need a way to distinguish the affected EHL SKUs, so I leave that
for a follow-up.
v2:
- Apply the WA at one place when calculating the PLL dividers from the
frequency and the frequency from the dividers for all the combo PLL
use cases (DP, HDMI, TBT). (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 41 +++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
index 61cb558c60d1..421176de5cfb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
@@ -2636,11 +2636,22 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
return true;
}
+/*
+ * Display WA #22010492432: tgl
+ * Program half of the nominal DCO divider fraction value.
+ */
+static bool
+tgl_combo_pll_div_frac_wa_needed(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
+{
+ return IS_TIGERLAKE(i915) && i915->dpll.ref_clks.nssc == 38400;
+}
+
static int __cnl_ddi_wrpll_get_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
const struct intel_shared_dpll *pll,
int ref_clock)
{
const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *pll_state = &pll->state.hw_state;
+ u32 dco_fraction;
u32 p0, p1, p2, dco_freq;
p0 = pll_state->cfgcr1 & DPLL_CFGCR1_PDIV_MASK;
@@ -2683,8 +2694,13 @@ static int __cnl_ddi_wrpll_get_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
dco_freq = (pll_state->cfgcr0 & DPLL_CFGCR0_DCO_INTEGER_MASK) *
ref_clock;
- dco_freq += (((pll_state->cfgcr0 & DPLL_CFGCR0_DCO_FRACTION_MASK) >>
- DPLL_CFGCR0_DCO_FRACTION_SHIFT) * ref_clock) / 0x8000;
+ dco_fraction = (pll_state->cfgcr0 & DPLL_CFGCR0_DCO_FRACTION_MASK) >>
+ DPLL_CFGCR0_DCO_FRACTION_SHIFT;
+
+ if (tgl_combo_pll_div_frac_wa_needed(dev_priv))
+ dco_fraction *= 2;
+
+ dco_freq += (dco_fraction * ref_clock) / 0x8000;
if (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, p0 == 0 || p1 == 0 || p2 == 0))
return 0;
@@ -2962,16 +2978,6 @@ static const struct skl_wrpll_params tgl_tbt_pll_24MHz_values = {
/* the following params are unused */
};
-/*
- * Display WA #22010492432: tgl
- * Divide the nominal .dco_fraction value by 2.
- */
-static const struct skl_wrpll_params tgl_tbt_pll_38_4MHz_values = {
- .dco_integer = 0x54, .dco_fraction = 0x1800,
- /* the following params are unused */
- .pdiv = 0, .kdiv = 0, .qdiv_mode = 0, .qdiv_ratio = 0,
-};
-
static bool icl_calc_dp_combo_pll(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
struct skl_wrpll_params *pll_params)
{
@@ -3005,14 +3011,12 @@ static bool icl_calc_tbt_pll(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
MISSING_CASE(dev_priv->dpll.ref_clks.nssc);
fallthrough;
case 19200:
+ case 38400:
*pll_params = tgl_tbt_pll_19_2MHz_values;
break;
case 24000:
*pll_params = tgl_tbt_pll_24MHz_values;
break;
- case 38400:
- *pll_params = tgl_tbt_pll_38_4MHz_values;
- break;
}
} else {
switch (dev_priv->dpll.ref_clks.nssc) {
@@ -3079,9 +3083,14 @@ static void icl_calc_dpll_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
const struct skl_wrpll_params *pll_params,
struct intel_dpll_hw_state *pll_state)
{
+ u32 dco_fraction = pll_params->dco_fraction;
+
memset(pll_state, 0, sizeof(*pll_state));
- pll_state->cfgcr0 = DPLL_CFGCR0_DCO_FRACTION(pll_params->dco_fraction) |
+ if (tgl_combo_pll_div_frac_wa_needed(i915))
+ dco_fraction = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(dco_fraction, 2);
+
+ pll_state->cfgcr0 = DPLL_CFGCR0_DCO_FRACTION(dco_fraction) |
pll_params->dco_integer;
pll_state->cfgcr1 = DPLL_CFGCR1_QDIV_RATIO(pll_params->qdiv_ratio) |
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
