Re: [PATCH v6 19/24] drm/i915/dg1: enable PORT C/D aka D/E

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 11:42:29PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> For DG1 we have a little of mix up wrt to DDI/port names and indexes.
> Bspec refers to the ports as DDIA, DDIB, DDI USBC1 and DDI USBC2
> (besides the DDIA, DDIB, DDIC, DDID), but the previous naming is the
> most unambiguous one. This means that for any register on Display Engine
> we should use the index of A, B, D and E. However in some places this is
> not true:
> 
> - VBT: uses C and D and have to be mapped to D/E
> 
> - IO/Combo: uses C and D, but we already differentiate those when
>   we created the phy vs port distinction.
> 
> Ths additional mapping for VBT and phy are already covered in previous
> patches, so now we can initialize the DDI as D/E.

I don't see a pressing need to keep this separate from patch 13; it's
probably easier to just roll patch 13 into this patch and enable all of
the outputs at once after we have all the plumbing in place.

> 
> Cc: Clinton Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 43fe5867a8ae..6a63fb0136d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -7332,10 +7332,7 @@ bool intel_phy_is_combo(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum phy phy)
>  {
>  	if (phy == PHY_NONE)
>  		return false;
> -	else if (IS_DG1(dev_priv))
> -		/* FIXME: Enable only two ports for now */
> -		return phy <= PHY_B;
> -	else if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv))
> +	else if (IS_DG1(dev_priv) || IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv))
>  		return phy <= PHY_D;
>  	else if (IS_ELKHARTLAKE(dev_priv))
>  		return phy <= PHY_C;
> @@ -7359,7 +7356,7 @@ bool intel_phy_is_tc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum phy phy)
>  
>  enum phy intel_port_to_phy(struct drm_i915_private *i915, enum port port)
>  {
> -	if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(i915) && port >= PORT_D)
> +	if ((IS_DG1(i915) || IS_ROCKETLAKE(i915)) && port >= PORT_D)
>  		return (enum phy)port - 1;
>  	else if (IS_ELKHARTLAKE(i915) && port == PORT_D)
>  		return PHY_A;
> @@ -17128,9 +17125,18 @@ static void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  		return;
>  
>  	if (IS_DG1(dev_priv)) {

We could just add IS_DG1 to the IS_ROCKETLAKE condition for the block
below since they're now the same thing.

In fact it might be worth explicitly mentioning the similarity to RKL in
the commit message.


Matt

> -		/* FIXME: Enable only two ports for now */
>  		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_A);
>  		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_B);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Bspec lists the ports as A, B, C (USBC1) and D (USBC2).
> +		 * However from the Display Engine perspective all registers are
> +		 * actually wired to handle C and D as offsets of D/E. Instead
> +		 * of fighting all our macros for handling them specially for
> +		 * DG1, just call them D/E
> +		 */
> +		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_D);
> +		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_E);
>  	} else if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv)) {
>  		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_A);
>  		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_B);
> -- 
> 2.28.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux