On Fri, 2020-09-25 at 15:17 +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <
> ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
> Move the intel_crtc_atomic_check() call out from the variable
> declarations to a place where we can actually see it.
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <
> ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 5a9d933e425a..11862de3d772 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -14844,8 +14844,10 @@ static int intel_atomic_check_crtcs(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> int i;
>
> for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> - int ret = intel_crtc_atomic_check(state, crtc);
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = intel_crtc_atomic_check(state, crtc);
> if (ret) {
> drm_dbg_atomic(&i915->drm,
> "[CRTC:%d:%s] atomic driver check failed\n",
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
