Since schedule-in and schedule-out are now both always under the tasklet
bitlock, we can reduce the individual atomic operations to simple
instructions and worry less. Critically this means that we can order the
update of ce->inflight to clear the lock to after we complete scheduling
out of the context, removing a window of indeterminant state for virtual
engines.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 52 ++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index 66354cb08b14..231fe39c88d5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -1358,11 +1358,11 @@ __execlists_schedule_in(struct i915_request *rq)
ce->lrc.ccid = ce->tag;
} else {
/* We don't need a strict matching tag, just different values */
- unsigned int tag = ffs(READ_ONCE(engine->context_tag));
+ unsigned int tag = __ffs(engine->context_tag);
- GEM_BUG_ON(tag == 0 || tag >= BITS_PER_LONG);
- clear_bit(tag - 1, &engine->context_tag);
- ce->lrc.ccid = tag << (GEN11_SW_CTX_ID_SHIFT - 32);
+ GEM_BUG_ON(tag >= BITS_PER_LONG);
+ __clear_bit(tag, &engine->context_tag);
+ ce->lrc.ccid = (1 + tag) << (GEN11_SW_CTX_ID_SHIFT - 32);
BUILD_BUG_ON(BITS_PER_LONG > GEN12_MAX_CONTEXT_HW_ID);
}
@@ -1375,6 +1375,8 @@ __execlists_schedule_in(struct i915_request *rq)
execlists_context_status_change(rq, INTEL_CONTEXT_SCHEDULE_IN);
intel_engine_context_in(engine);
+ CE_TRACE(ce, "schedule-in, ccid:%x\n", ce->lrc.ccid);
+
return engine;
}
@@ -1386,13 +1388,10 @@ static inline void execlists_schedule_in(struct i915_request *rq, int idx)
GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_engine_pm_is_awake(rq->engine));
trace_i915_request_in(rq, idx);
- old = READ_ONCE(ce->inflight);
- do {
- if (!old) {
- WRITE_ONCE(ce->inflight, __execlists_schedule_in(rq));
- break;
- }
- } while (!try_cmpxchg(&ce->inflight, &old, ptr_inc(old)));
+ old = ce->inflight;
+ if (!old)
+ old = __execlists_schedule_in(rq);
+ WRITE_ONCE(ce->inflight, ptr_inc(old));
GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_inflight(ce) != rq->engine);
}
@@ -1406,12 +1405,11 @@ static void kick_siblings(struct i915_request *rq, struct intel_context *ce)
tasklet_hi_schedule(&ve->base.execlists.tasklet);
}
-static inline void
-__execlists_schedule_out(struct i915_request *rq,
- struct intel_engine_cs * const engine,
- unsigned int ccid)
+static inline void __execlists_schedule_out(struct i915_request *rq)
{
struct intel_context * const ce = rq->context;
+ struct intel_engine_cs * const engine = rq->engine;
+ unsigned int ccid;
/*
* NB process_csb() is not under the engine->active.lock and hence
@@ -1419,6 +1417,8 @@ __execlists_schedule_out(struct i915_request *rq,
* refrain from doing non-trivial work here.
*/
+ CE_TRACE(ce, "schedule-out, ccid:%x\n", ce->lrc.ccid);
+
/*
* If we have just completed this context, the engine may now be
* idle and we want to re-enter powersaving.
@@ -1427,12 +1427,13 @@ __execlists_schedule_out(struct i915_request *rq,
i915_request_completed(rq))
intel_engine_add_retire(engine, ce->timeline);
+ ccid = ce->lrc.ccid;
ccid >>= GEN11_SW_CTX_ID_SHIFT - 32;
ccid &= GEN12_MAX_CONTEXT_HW_ID;
if (ccid < BITS_PER_LONG) {
GEM_BUG_ON(ccid == 0);
GEM_BUG_ON(test_bit(ccid - 1, &engine->context_tag));
- set_bit(ccid - 1, &engine->context_tag);
+ __set_bit(ccid - 1, &engine->context_tag);
}
intel_context_update_runtime(ce);
@@ -1453,26 +1454,23 @@ __execlists_schedule_out(struct i915_request *rq,
*/
if (ce->engine != engine)
kick_siblings(rq, ce);
-
- intel_context_put(ce);
}
static inline void
execlists_schedule_out(struct i915_request *rq)
{
struct intel_context * const ce = rq->context;
- struct intel_engine_cs *cur, *old;
- u32 ccid;
trace_i915_request_out(rq);
- ccid = rq->context->lrc.ccid;
- old = READ_ONCE(ce->inflight);
- do
- cur = ptr_unmask_bits(old, 2) ? ptr_dec(old) : NULL;
- while (!try_cmpxchg(&ce->inflight, &old, cur));
- if (!cur)
- __execlists_schedule_out(rq, old, ccid);
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!ce->inflight);
+ ce->inflight = ptr_dec(ce->inflight);
+ if (!intel_context_inflight_count(ce)) {
+ GEM_BUG_ON(ce->inflight != rq->engine);
+ __execlists_schedule_out(rq);
+ WRITE_ONCE(ce->inflight, NULL);
+ intel_context_put(ce);
+ }
i915_request_put(rq);
}
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
