Hi!
> > I think there's been some discussion about reverting that change for
> > other reasons, but it's quite likely the culprit.
>
> Hmm. It reverts cleanly, but the end result doesn't work, because of
> other changes.
>
> Reverting all of
>
> 763fedd6a216 ("drm/i915: Remove i915_gem_object_get_dirty_page()")
> 7ac2d2536dfa ("drm/i915/gem: Delete unused code")
> 9e0f9464e2ab ("drm/i915/gem: Async GPU relocations only")
>
> seems to at least build.
>
> Pavel, does doing those three reverts make things work for you?
Yes, it seems they make things work. (Chris asked for new patch to be
tested, so I am switching to his kernel, but it survived longer than
it usually does.)
Thanks and best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
