When igt_random_offset() is a given a range of [0, PAGE_SIZE], it is
allowed to return 0. However, attempting to use a size of 0 for the
igt_lmem_write_cpu() byte poking, leads to call igt_random_offset() with
a range of [offset, offset + 0] and ask it to find a length of 4 within
it. This triggers the bug on that the requested length should fit within
the range!
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx>
---
I feel into the same trap of not fixing up the random return of 0.
And then the trap of it returning -1.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c
index 6e80d99048e4..741270fcb6b9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c
@@ -522,9 +522,9 @@ static int igt_lmem_write_cpu(void *arg)
goto out_unpin;
}
- /* We want to throw in a random width/align */
- bytes[0] = igt_random_offset(&prng, 0, PAGE_SIZE, sizeof(u32),
- sizeof(u32));
+ /* A random multiple of u32, picked between [64, PAGE_SIZE - 64] */
+ bytes[0] = igt_random_offset(&prng, 64, PAGE_SIZE - 64, 0, sizeof(u32));
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(bytes[0], sizeof(u32)));
i = 0;
do {
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
