On 31/07/2020 17:30, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2020-07-31 14:45:52)
- drm_syncobj_replace_fence(syncobj, fence);
+ if (eb->fences[n].chain_fence) {
+ drm_syncobj_add_point(syncobj, eb->fences[n].chain_fence,
+ fence, eb->fences[n].value);
This function remains not acceptable. It is trivial to write an igt test
that causes the DRM_ERROR. A user controllable error message is still
not allowed. If you do not have such a test in your igt series, then that
too is lacking.
-Chris
As far as I remember there are IGT tests for this (*unordered* subtests).
So CI should report a fairlure. The IGT test itself won't fail though.
I thought we removed that DRM_ERROR a while ago.
I'll send a patch to remove it. Thanks.
-Lionel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx