Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2020-07-31 14:45:52) > Introduces a new parameters to execbuf so that we can specify syncobj > handles as well as timeline points. > > v2: Reuse i915_user_extension_fn > > v3: Check that the chained extension is only present once (Chris) > > v4: Check that dma_fence_chain_find_seqno returns a non NULL fence (Lionel) > > v5: Use BIT_ULL (Chris) > > v6: Fix issue with already signaled timeline points, > dma_fence_chain_find_seqno() setting fence to NULL (Chris) > > v7: Report ENOENT with invalid syncobj handle (Lionel) > > v8: Check for out of order timeline point insertion (Chris) > > v9: After explanations on > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2019-August/229287.html > drop the ordering check from v8 (Lionel) > > v10: Set first extension enum item to 1 (Jason) The other unaddressed issue here is that we do not need to arbitrarily limit the caller to only a single extension. The code to handle multiple invocations is actually smaller... -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
