Re: [PATCH 13/66] drm/i915/gem: Don't drop the timeline lock during execbuf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 7/15/20 1:50 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
Our timeline lock is our defence against a concurrent execbuf
interrupting our request construction. we need hold it throughout or,
for example, a second thread may interject a relocation request in
between our own relocation request and execution in the ring.

A second, major benefit, is that it allows us to preserve a large chunk
of the ringbuffer for our exclusive use; which should virtually
eliminate the threat of hitting a wait_for_space during request
construction -- although we should have already dropped other
contentious locks at that point.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@xxxxxxxxx>


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux