I verified igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic with and without this patch on my local build and observed that test is passing in both cases. Test result with 9694a4caf26c drm-tip: 2020y-07m-30d-12h-33m-57s
UTC integration manifest $ sudo ./build/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking --r basic IGT-Version: 1.25-g3ecf9d888 (x86_64) (Linux: 5.8.0-rc7+ x86_64) FBC last action not supported Can't test PSR: not supported by sink. Can't test DRRS: Not supported. Starting subtest: basic Subtest basic: SUCCESS (2.572s) With “drm/i915/gt: Initialize reserved and unspecified MOCS indices” on top of 9694a4caf26c $ sudo ./build/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking --r basic IGT-Version: 1.25-g3ecf9d888 (x86_64) (Linux: 5.8.0-rc7+ x86_64) FBC last action not supported Can't test PSR: not supported by sink. Can't test DRRS: Not supported. Starting subtest: basic Subtest basic: SUCCESS (2.585s) Regards -Ayaz From: Patchwork <patchwork@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Patch Details
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8814 -> Patchwork_18266
Summary
FAILURE Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_18266 absolutely need to be If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes External URL:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18266/index.html Possible new issues
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_18266: IGT changes
Possible regressions
Suppressed
The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
Known issues
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_18266 that come from known issues: IGT changes
Issues hit
Possible fixes
Warnings
{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing Participating hosts (39 -> 36)
Additional (1): fi-tgl-u2 Build changes
CI-20190529: 20190529 == Linux commits == 2415991b5aeb drm/i915/gt: Initialize reserved and unspecified MOCS indices |
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx