Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-07-13 15:53:56) > > On 06/07/2020 07:19, Chris Wilson wrote: > Just a temporary stage... are we reviewing those? Best if they can be > avoided. Yes, I am not chuffed in having it. But with the transition from using an array of execobj[] to having a list that includes the supplementary objects, the inplace swap() now breaks the lists. We would have to do a bunch of list_replace() to preserve them. At the moment, I think this is the lessor of evils, although it is quite hideous. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
