On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 07:40:35PM +0000, Souza, Jose wrote: > On Thu, 2020-07-09 at 17:24 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 01:55:11PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > > Hours Of Battery Life is a new GEN12+ power-saving feature that allows > > > supported motherboards to use a special voltage swing table for eDP > > > panels that uses less power. > > > > > > So here if supported by HW, OEM will set it in VBT and i915 will try > > > to train link with HOBL vswing table if link training fails it fall > > > back to the original table. > > > > > > intel_ddi_dp_preemph_max() was optimized to only check the HOBL flag > > > instead of do something like is done in intel_ddi_dp_voltage_max() > > > because it is only called after the first entry of the voltage swing > > > table was loaded so the HOBL flag is valid at that point. > > > > > > v3: > > > - removed a few parameters of icl_ddi_combo_vswing_program() that > > > can be taken from encoder(TODO) > > > > > > v4: > > > - using the HOBL vswing table until training fails completely (Ville) > > > > > > BSpec: 49291 > > > BSpec: 49399 > > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++--- > > > .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 2 + > > > .../drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c | 5 +++ > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 + > > > 4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c > > > index 2c484b55bcdf..bf86c588f726 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c > > > @@ -706,6 +706,15 @@ static const struct cnl_ddi_buf_trans tgl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_dp_hbr2[] = > > > { 0x6, 0x7F, 0x3F, 0x00, 0x00 }, /* 900 900 0.0 */ > > > }; > > > > > > +static const struct cnl_ddi_buf_trans tgl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_edp_hbr2_hobl[] = { > > > + { 0x6, 0x7F, 0x3F, 0x00, 0x00 } > > > +}; > > > + > > > +static bool is_hobl_buf_trans(const struct cnl_ddi_buf_trans *table) > > > +{ > > > + return table == tgl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_edp_hbr2_hobl; > > > +} > > > + > > > static const struct ddi_buf_trans * > > > bdw_get_buf_trans_edp(struct intel_encoder *encoder, int *n_entries) > > > { > > > @@ -1050,6 +1059,16 @@ static const struct cnl_ddi_buf_trans * > > > tgl_get_combo_buf_trans(struct intel_encoder *encoder, int type, int rate, > > > int *n_entries) > > > { > > > + if (type == INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP && dev_priv->vbt.edp.hobl) { > > > + struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder); > > > + > > > + if (!intel_dp->hobl_disabled && rate <= 540000) { > > > + /* Same table applies to TGL, RKL and DG1 */ > > > + *n_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(tgl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_edp_hbr2_hobl); > > > + return tgl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_edp_hbr2_hobl; > > > + } > > > + } > > > + > > > if (type == INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI || type == INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP) { > > > return icl_get_combo_buf_trans(encoder, type, rate, n_entries); > > > } else if (rate > 270000) { > > > @@ -2223,13 +2242,12 @@ static u8 intel_ddi_dp_voltage_max(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) > > > DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_MASK; > > > } > > > > > > -/* > > > - * We assume that the full set of pre-emphasis values can be > > > - * used on all DDI platforms. Should that change we need to > > > - * rethink this code. > > > - */ > > > static u8 intel_ddi_dp_preemph_max(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) > > > { > > > + /* HOBL voltage swing table only have one entry */ > > > + if (intel_dp->hobl_active) > > > + return DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_0; > > > > That's illegal. We need to claim support for at least all > > vswing/pre-emphasis levels 0-2. 3 is optional. Though there is > > some confusion around this in the eDP spec where it kinda seems suggest > > that even some of the level 2 things are optional. But it's so unclear > > I would defer to just trusting what the DP spec says. > > Okay so in this case I should add more entries to tgl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_edp_hbr2_hobl with the same values to match the minimum required by > DP spec? Yeah, I guess that's the easiest way to do it without redesigning the whole .{voltage,preemph}_max() stuff. > > > > > /me goes to write the patch with the WARNs... > > Will take a look. > > > > > > > > + > > > return DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_3; > > > } > > > > > > @@ -2392,6 +2410,15 @@ static void icl_ddi_combo_vswing_program(struct intel_encoder *encoder, > > > level = n_entries - 1; > > > } > > > > > > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12 && type == INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP) { > > > + struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder); > > > + > > > + val = EDP4K2K_MODE_OVRD_EN | EDP4K2K_MODE_OVRD_OPTIMIZED; > > > + intel_dp->hobl_active = is_hobl_buf_trans(ddi_translations); > > > + intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, ICL_PORT_CL_DW10(phy), val, > > > + intel_dp->hobl_active ? val : 0); > > > + } > > > > I'd still suggest writing that unconditionally. > > Okay > > > > > > + > > > /* Set PORT_TX_DW5 */ > > > val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, ICL_PORT_TX_DW5_LN0(phy)); > > > val &= ~(SCALING_MODE_SEL_MASK | RTERM_SELECT_MASK | > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h > > > index e8f809161c75..fd4f0e4d0be7 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h > > > @@ -1375,6 +1375,8 @@ struct intel_dp { > > > > > > /* Display stream compression testing */ > > > bool force_dsc_en; > > > + > > > + u8 hobl_disabled : 1, hobl_active : 1, hobl_not_used : 6; > > > > Why did we go from a simple boolean to this complicated thing? > > Will try to remove one. > > > > > > }; > > > > > > enum lspcon_vendor { > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c > > > index 2493142a70e9..925822fd386d 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c > > > @@ -401,6 +401,11 @@ intel_dp_start_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) > > > intel_connector->base.base.id, > > > intel_connector->base.name, > > > intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count); > > > + if (intel_dp->hobl_active) { > > > + drm_dbg_kms(&dp_to_i915(intel_dp)->drm, > > > + "Link Training failed with HOBL active, not enabling it for now on"); > > > + intel_dp->hobl_disabled = true; > > > > I don't think we should do the link rate/lanes reduction in > > this case. Ie. we should just mark hobl as no good and retry > > the link training with the same link param limits. > > Okay > > > > > > + } > > > if (!intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(intel_dp, > > > intel_dp->link_rate, > > > intel_dp->lane_count)) > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > index 86a23ced051b..ea16931c0fa4 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > @@ -1898,6 +1898,8 @@ static inline bool i915_mmio_reg_valid(i915_reg_t reg) > > > #define PWR_DOWN_LN_3_1_0 (0xb << 4) > > > #define PWR_DOWN_LN_MASK (0xf << 4) > > > #define PWR_DOWN_LN_SHIFT 4 > > > +#define EDP4K2K_MODE_OVRD_EN (1 << 3) > > > +#define EDP4K2K_MODE_OVRD_OPTIMIZED (1 << 2) > > > > > > #define ICL_PORT_CL_DW12(phy) _MMIO(_ICL_PORT_CL_DW(12, phy)) > > > #define ICL_LANE_ENABLE_AUX (1 << 0) > > > -- > > > 2.27.0 -- Ville Syrjälä Intel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx