Hi,
On 6/22/20 9:57 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 02:17:54PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Implement the pwm_ops.get_state() method to complete the support for the
new atomic PWM API.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v3:
- Add Andy's Reviewed-by tag
- Remove extra whitespace to align some code after assignments (requested by
Uwe Kleine-König)
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
index 8a7f4707279c..b311354d40a3 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
@@ -119,8 +119,37 @@ static int crc_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
return 0;
}
+static void crc_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+ struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+ struct crystalcove_pwm *crc_pwm = to_crc_pwm(chip);
+ struct device *dev = crc_pwm->chip.dev;
+ unsigned int clk_div, clk_div_reg, duty_cycle_reg;
+ int error;
+
+ error = regmap_read(crc_pwm->regmap, PWM0_CLK_DIV, &clk_div_reg);
+ if (error) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Error reading PWM0_CLK_DIV %d\n", error);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ error = regmap_read(crc_pwm->regmap, PWM0_DUTY_CYCLE, &duty_cycle_reg);
+ if (error) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Error reading PWM0_DUTY_CYCLE %d\n", error);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ clk_div = (clk_div_reg & ~PWM_OUTPUT_ENABLE) + 1;
+
+ state->period = clk_div * NSEC_PER_USEC * 256 / PWM_BASE_CLK_MHZ;
+ state->duty_cycle = duty_cycle_reg * state->period / PWM_MAX_LEVEL;
Please round up here.
Ok, I can fix that for the next version of this patch-set. Before I
post a new version of this patch-set, you have only responded to
some of the PWM patches in this set. Do you have any remarks on the
other PWM patches ?
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
