From: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@xxxxxxxxx>
It is not really unexpected to hit wedge on init this way.
We're already downgrading error printk when running with fault injection,
let's use the same approach for CI tainting.
Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h
index 82fada1e7552..d84c23592942 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h
@@ -438,7 +438,9 @@ static inline const char *enableddisabled(bool v)
static inline void __add_taint_for_CI(unsigned int taint)
{
- add_taint(taint, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
+ /* Failures that occur during fault injection testing are expected */
+ if (!i915_error_injected())
+ add_taint(taint, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
}
static inline void
--
2.27.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
