On 6/23/20 4:28 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Execbuffer submission will perform its own WW locking, and we cannot rely on the implicit lock there. This also makes it clear that the GVT code will get a lockdep splat when multiple batchbuffer shadows need to be performed in the same instance, fix that up. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c | 20 ++++++------------- .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 13 ++++++++++-- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h | 1 - .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/huge_pages.c | 5 ++++- .../i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_coherency.c | 14 +++++++++---- .../drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c | 12 ++++++++--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++-- 8 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
ltgm. Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@xxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
