On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 12:28:53AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 03:11:08PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > Based on the platform, Bspec expects us to wait or poll with
> > timeout for DDI BUF IDLE bit to be set to 0 (non idle) or get active
> > after enabling DDI_BUF_CTL.
> >
> > v3:
> > * Add a new function _active for DDI BUF CTL to be non idle (Ville)
> > v2:
> > * Based on platform, fixed delay or poll (Ville)
> > * Use a helper to do this (Imre, Ville)
> >
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > index 7d5c8ab88fc4..ff6b1e9d1b4e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > @@ -1195,6 +1195,20 @@ static void intel_wait_ddi_buf_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > port_name(port));
> > }
> >
> > +static void intel_wait_ddi_buf_active(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > + enum port port)
> > +{
> > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) <= 9) {
>
> Didn't we want the poll approach for glk+?
Actually in the bspec I only see Gen10+ has a 500usecs timeout
Manasi
>
> > + usleep_range(600, 1000);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (wait_for_us(!(intel_de_read(dev_priv, DDI_BUF_CTL(port)) &
> > + DDI_BUF_IS_IDLE), 600))
> > + drm_err(&dev_priv->drm, "Timeout waiting for DDI BUF %c to get active\n",
> > + port_name(port));
> > +}
> > +
> > static u32 hsw_pll_to_ddi_pll_sel(const struct intel_shared_dpll *pll)
> > {
> > switch (pll->info->id) {
> > @@ -4020,7 +4034,7 @@ static void intel_ddi_prepare_link_retrain(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > intel_de_write(dev_priv, DDI_BUF_CTL(port), intel_dp->DP);
> > intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, DDI_BUF_CTL(port));
> >
> > - udelay(600);
> > + intel_wait_ddi_buf_active(dev_priv, port);
>
> Missed the FDI case.
>
> Also we're still missing this for HDMI, on icl+ I think? Can't quite
> remember if that was where the spec started to demand it.
>
> > }
> >
> > static void intel_ddi_set_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > --
> > 2.19.1
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
