Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/display: remove alias to dig_port

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 05:16:06PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 04:28:20PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
We don't need intel_dig_port and dig_port to refer to the same thing.
Prefer the latter.

Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
index ca7bb2294d2b..58c9f3d3e7ce 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
@@ -3382,11 +3382,10 @@ static void intel_ddi_pre_enable_hdmi(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 				      const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
 				      const struct drm_connector_state *conn_state)
 {
-	struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = enc_to_dig_port(encoder);
-	struct intel_hdmi *intel_hdmi = &intel_dig_port->hdmi;
+	struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = enc_to_dig_port(encoder);
+	struct intel_hdmi *intel_hdmi = &dig_port->hdmi;
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
 	int level = intel_ddi_hdmi_level(encoder);
-	struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = enc_to_dig_port(encoder);

 	intel_dp_dual_mode_set_tmds_output(intel_hdmi, true);
 	intel_ddi_clk_select(encoder, crtc_state);
@@ -3413,7 +3412,7 @@ static void intel_ddi_pre_enable_hdmi(struct intel_atomic_state *state,

 	intel_ddi_enable_pipe_clock(encoder, crtc_state);

-	intel_dig_port->set_infoframes(encoder,
+	dig_port->set_infoframes(encoder,
 				       crtc_state->has_infoframe,
 				       crtc_state, conn_state);

Misalinged parameters staring me in the face here. Didn't trawl the
other patch for similar since it's so big.

I did review the second one for misaligned things. I think I forgot to
go back to this one because only after some review I noticed checkpatch
was not failing for me for these misaligned parameters, not sure why.

Lucas De Marchi


 }
--
2.26.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux