Quoting Thomas Hellström (Intel) (2020-06-23 16:37:30) > > On 6/23/20 12:03 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Thomas Hellström (Intel) (2020-06-23 10:33:20) > >> Hi, Chris! > >> > >> On 6/22/20 11:59 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > >>> In order to actually handle eviction and what not, we need to process > >>> all the objects together under a common lock, reservation_ww_class. As > >>> such, do a memory reservation pass after looking up the object/vma, > >>> which then feeds into the rest of execbuf [relocation, cmdparsing, > >>> flushing and ofc execution]. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> --- > >>> .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 91 ++++++++++++++----- > >>> 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > >>> > >> Which tree is this against? The series doesn't apply cleanly against > >> drm-tip? > > It's continuing on from the scheduler patches, the bug fixes and the > > iris-deferred-fence work. I thought throwing all of those old patches > > into the pile would have been distracting. > > Is there somewhere you could push a branch for reviewer consumption? I added some patches to remove some locked waits and having been regretting it all today. Coming soon, schedulers for all. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
