On Sunday, January 27, 2013 04:45:51 PM Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang at intel.com> wrote: > > i915 driver needs to do modeset when > > 1. system resumes from sleep > > 2. lid is opened > > > > In PM_SUSPEND_MEM state, all the GPEs are cleared when system resumes, > > thus it is the i915_resume code does the modeset rather than intel_lid_notify(). > > > > In PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE state, system is still resposive to the lid events. > > 1. When we close the lid in Freeze state, intel_lid_notify() sets modeset_on_lid. > > 2. When we reopen the lid, intel_lid_notify() will do a modeset, > > before the system is resumed. > > > > here is the error log, > > > > [92146.548074] WARNING: at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:1028 intel_wait_for_pipe_off+0x184/0x190 [i915]() > > [92146.548076] Hardware name: VGN-Z540N > > [92146.548078] pipe_off wait timed out > > [92146.548167] Modules linked in: hid_generic usbhid hid snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec parport_pc snd_hwdep ppdev snd_pcm_oss i915 snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm arc4 iwldvm snd_seq_dummy mac80211 snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi fbcon tileblit font bitblit softcursor drm_kms_helper snd_rawmidi snd_seq_midi_event coretemp drm snd_seq kvm btusb bluetooth snd_timer iwlwifi pcmcia tpm_infineon i2c_algo_bit joydev snd_seq_device intel_agp cfg80211 snd intel_gtt yenta_socket pcmcia_rsrc sony_laptop agpgart microcode psmouse tpm_tis serio_raw mxm_wmi soundcore snd_page_alloc tpm acpi_cpufreq lpc_ich pcmcia_core tpm_bios mperf processor lp parport firewire_ohci firewire_core crc_itu_t sdhci_pci sdhci thermal e1000e > > [92146.548173] Pid: 4304, comm: kworker/0:0 Tainted: G W 3.8.0-rc3-s0i3-v3-test+ #9 > > [92146.548175] Call Trace: > > [92146.548189] [<c10378e2>] warn_slowpath_common+0x72/0xa0 > > [92146.548227] [<f86398b4>] ? intel_wait_for_pipe_off+0x184/0x190 [i915] > > [92146.548263] [<f86398b4>] ? intel_wait_for_pipe_off+0x184/0x190 [i915] > > [92146.548270] [<c10379b3>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x33/0x40 > > [92146.548307] [<f86398b4>] intel_wait_for_pipe_off+0x184/0x190 [i915] > > [92146.548344] [<f86399c2>] intel_disable_pipe+0x102/0x190 [i915] > > [92146.548380] [<f8639ea4>] ? intel_disable_plane+0x64/0x80 [i915] > > [92146.548417] [<f8639f7c>] i9xx_crtc_disable+0xbc/0x150 [i915] > > [92146.548456] [<f863ebee>] intel_crtc_update_dpms+0x5e/0x90 [i915] > > [92146.548493] [<f86437cf>] intel_modeset_setup_hw_state+0x42f/0x8f0 [i915] > > [92146.548535] [<f8645b0b>] intel_lid_notify+0x9b/0xc0 [i915] > > [92146.548543] [<c15610d3>] notifier_call_chain+0x43/0x60 > > [92146.548550] [<c105d1e1>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x41/0x80 > > [92146.548556] [<c105d23f>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x1f/0x30 > > [92146.548563] [<c131a684>] acpi_lid_send_state+0x78/0xa4 > > [92146.548569] [<c131aa9e>] acpi_button_notify+0x3b/0xf1 > > [92146.548577] [<c12df56a>] ? acpi_os_execute+0x17/0x19 > > [92146.548582] [<c12e591a>] ? acpi_ec_sync_query+0xa5/0xbc > > [92146.548589] [<c12e2b82>] acpi_device_notify+0x16/0x18 > > [92146.548595] [<c12f4904>] acpi_ev_notify_dispatch+0x38/0x4f > > [92146.548600] [<c12df0e8>] acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x20/0x2b > > [92146.548607] [<c1051208>] process_one_work+0x128/0x3f0 > > [92146.548613] [<c1564f73>] ? common_interrupt+0x33/0x38 > > [92146.548618] [<c104f8c0>] ? wake_up_worker+0x30/0x30 > > [92146.548624] [<c12df0c8>] ? acpi_os_wait_events_complete+0x1e/0x1e > > [92146.548629] [<c10524f9>] worker_thread+0x119/0x3b0 > > [92146.548634] [<c10523e0>] ? manage_workers+0x240/0x240 > > [92146.548640] [<c1056e84>] kthread+0x94/0xa0 > > [92146.548647] [<c1060000>] ? ftrace_raw_output_sched_stat_runtime+0x70/0xf0 > > [92146.548652] [<c15649b7>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x1b/0x28 > > [92146.548658] [<c1056df0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0xc0/0xc0 > > > > so I'd like to use tristate for modeset_on_lid instead of bool. > > -1: ingore all the lid events. > > 0: do not do modeset when there is a lid-open event. > > 1: do modeset when there is a lid-open event. > > In this way, only device resume code will do modeset in a suspend/resume cycle. > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang at intel.com> > > Given that this essentially requires users to manually set this module > option to make stuff work I don't like this. > > I see a few possible options: > - plug the races between all the different parts - I've never really > understood why acpi sends us events before the resume code has > completed ... This particular one may be a result of patch [2/3] in the series, actually, because that patch makes SCI work over the whole cycle. > If that's indeed intentional, we could delay the > handling a bit until at least the i915 resume code completed. I would do that for now at least if possible. It shouldn't hurt anyway. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
