Quoting Matt Roper (2020-06-06 04:21:37) > On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 11:11:23PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Matt Roper (2020-06-04 17:39:16) > > > On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 08:34:04AM +0000, Patchwork wrote: > > > > == Series Details == > > > > > > > > Series: Remaining RKL patches > > > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77971/ > > > > State : success > > > > > > > > == Summary == > > > > > > > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8579_full -> Patchwork_17859_full > > > > ==================================================== > > > > > > > > Summary > > > > ------- > > > > > > > > **SUCCESS** > > > > > > > > No regressions found. > > > > > > Patches #1, 6, 8, and 11 from this series applied to dinq since they have r-b's. > > > > This seems to have introduced > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8584/fi-skl-guc/igt@runner@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > Thanks for pointing that out. I think it's because we lost DP-E > matching in the VBT mapping table during the refactor. If so, > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/368948/?series=78060&rev=1 > > should fix it. It did indeed. > Was there a gitlab bug for this failure? Not yet. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
